CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112JUD003446297
12 novembre 2002
or its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).
Page 56 sur 2215
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0524DEC001614208
24 mai 2018
Together with this proposal, the applicant also received an information note in Ukrainian indicating that, according to Rule 62 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the friendly settlement negotiations were strictly
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0511DEC001017282
11 mai 1988
43 para. 3 (a) of the Rules of Procedure.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC003548009
14 février 2012
On 2 February 2010, the Court decided to apply Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and to stay the applicant’s deportation to Burundi for the duration of the proceedings before it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1128JUD003709397
28 novembre 2002
The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC004873606
26 février 2008
In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and to strike the case out of the list.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1023JUD000854479
23 octobre 1984
The Chamber constituted to hear the case relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the plenary Court on 27 May 1983 (Rule 48 of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD000790102
18 mars 2014
In the lack of any supporting evidence, the Court rejects the applicants’ claim for costs and expenses in accordance with Rule 60 of the Rule of the Court. C.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0830JUD003708703
30 août 2022
The Court considers that the applicant’s death constitutes a fact of “decisive influence” on the outcome of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0716JUD004852199
16 juillet 2002
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0331JUD001938592
31 mars 1998
of Rules of Court A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD005901714
21 janvier 2021
In these circumstances, the Court is unable to consider the matter (Rule 60 of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1007DEC002735019
7 octobre 2025
28 § 3 of the Rules of Court); Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1021JUD002492294
21 octobre 2004
The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0922JUD001531089
22 septembre 1993
represent him (Rule 30). 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0628DEC002437294
28 juin 1995
Section 101 of the Criminal Code classifies breaches of rules of law which are punishable with imprisonment or a fine as minor offences (Übertretungen).
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0317REP001053283
17 mars 1989
On 7 July 1986 the Commission decided to give notice of the application to the respondent Government and to invite them, in accordance with Rule 42 para. 2 (b) of its Rules of
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0628JUD001657408
28 juin 2013
37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0212JUD000931781
12 février 1985
Wiarda, the President of the Court (Rule 21 para. 3 (b) of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103DEC002166210
3 novembre 2011
The Court’s Rule 39 indication On 21 April 2010 the President of the First Section decided to apply interim measures under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court in the applicant’s case, requesting