In January 1994 J.S. left Poland together with the child and settled in Germany. She did not inform the applicant about it and did not give their new address in Germany. B.

l'embauche, lesquelles n'avaient respectivement été souscrites que le 12 mars 2005 et le 7 juin 2005 ; que l'enquête établissait que le bar avait été exploité par Jean-Claude A..., en sa qualité de gérant

le tract du 6 février 1992 d'une question sur l'absence de réponse de la partie civile aux questions posées sur la tenue des stocks et de la destination éventuelle des produits alimentaires sous la gérance

L. 241-9 du Code de commerce, 427, 591 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale, défaut de motifs, manque de base légale ; "en ce que l'arrêt attaqué a déclaré Philippe X... coupable, en sa qualité de gérant

Germany (dec.), no. 12923/03, 25 September 2007). 2.

  The German branch is domiciled at Griesheim.   Its managing director is Mr. Knut Stache.

    The applicant had been a member of the German Democratic Republic police service since December 1975.

The applicant worked as an authorised signatory of a German private bank and, from 2007 to 2011, co-signed the bank’s corporate tax returns.

Whether or not it proved necessary in the event to adduce the oral evidence of German factual witnesses, the greater availability of such witnesses as a trial in Germany was a legitimate reason for favouring

It was true that the Court had, in fact, summoned witnesses in the Federal Republic of Germany to appear and give evidence at the trial but these summonses had only been transmitted by the German authorities

Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ VII; Herbst v. Germany , no. 20027/02, 11   January 2007; and Rumpf v.

Les détournements d'actifs commis par la gérante sont pareillement caractérisés.

Germany (no. 16313/10, § 74, 17 March 2016) and Egill Einarsson v. Iceland (no. 2) (no. 31221/15, §§ 31 ‑ 37, 17 July 2018).

in 1952 and lives in Töging, Germany.

Germany , no. 29357/95, § 70, ECHR 2000 ‑ II and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000 ‑ VII).

  Germany and various follow-up cases, the German Federal Constitutional Court held in a judgment of 4   May 2011 that provisions on the retrospective prolongation of preventive detention beyond

It underlined that there was under German law no legal basis to grant the applicant sole custody rights if the child’s mother did not agree. 6.

    The applicant went to Germany, where, on 15 March 2007 he was employed by a German company. However, he attended all the hearings in the case against him in Bulgaria. 40 .

X... n'avait pas exercé les fonctions de gérant de fait de la société, a rejeté la demande de redressement judiciaire formée contre lui par le liquidateur de la société sur le fondement de l'article 182