CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

4 744 résultats pour « Sher MESSINGER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1022DEC003759897

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2002

22 octobre 2002

The Court concludes therefore that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention.

Page 55 sur 238

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226250

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2023

13 juillet 2023

He also argued that it was common knowledge that G.M. and K.A.’s wife held sixty and forty percent respectively of the shares in a local law firm. Thus, K.A. had also economic links with G.M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC003074202

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2005

13 décembre 2005

He had also taken a four months' course in management with the intention of carrying on his father's sheet-iron business.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114588

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2012

17 octobre 2012

He argued that he had lost his shares in Demirbank as a result of its transfer to the Fund and requested the annulment of the Board’s implied rejection of his compensation claim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD005395712

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2023

1 juin 2023

    The applicant had a 50% share in the ownership of a wedding hall in Sumgayit. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0412DEC002690795

Admin. suprême

12 avril 1996

12 avril 1996

  The appropriate means to finance public broadcasting was the levying of fees, which enabled it to offer a programme independent of shares of audience and the placement of commercials.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303DEC001905403

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2009

3 mars 2009

On 20 June 2004 the applicant's legal-aid lawyer informed him that she had not found any grounds to lodge a cassation appeal in the case. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022REP002448494

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1997

22 octobre 1997

  It is also      important that she is informed as early as possible.   Thus,      we do not share [K.W.'s] and [M.W.'

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1009JUD007499517

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2025

9 octobre 2025

She found that the applicant had been lawfully sanctioned, which had resulted in the three-month prohibition on meetings with his relatives. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103JUD004805311

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2015

3 novembre 2015

She further acted as an expert and adviser at meetings before the parliamentary finance subcommittee where amendments to the Tax Act were being examined.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD005902614

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2021

15 avril 2021

The share in question amounted to 339/1000 of the whole. Of this share, the applicant bought a part of one-eighth (hereinafter “the asset”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840791

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

She had given one twelfth of the plot to the applicant and one twelfth to his brother, Mr Elias Kyriakou, in the form of an unregistered gift.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410DEC000077303

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2007

10 avril 2007

It also attached the Oriana company’s bank accounts and its shares (including the shares which the Oriana company owned in the “Lukor” company).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0111DEC001895991

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 1995

11 janvier 1995

  However, of the two persons who attended the meeting only one, M.P., was heard by the Court of Appeal as a witness for the prosecution.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171808

Admin. suprême

9 février 2017

9 février 2017

She took a bus to Austria; from there she was driven to Poland by her brothers. K.P. refused to return her son to Italy or to move there with him. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0707JUD001085784

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 1989

7 juillet 1989

The Court had held a preparatory meeting immediately beforehand. There appeared before the Court: - for the Government   Mr C.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD000097620

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2023

17 janvier 2023

The first meeting between the representatives of the two sides took place on 21 August 2017. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD004835707

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2014

24 juin 2014

contained and which was one of the possible meanings of the original text.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123JUD003747711

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

M r   FROLOV’S ATTEMPTS TO HOLD A RELIGIOUS MEETING FOR THE PROMOTION OF THE TEACHING OF VAISHNAVISM First notification to hold a religious meeting 14 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1201JUD002637418

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2020

1 décembre 2020

criticism during this meeting for having failed to provide justification for each of the candidates that she had proposed to Parliament. 46 .

Source officielle