Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194529
17 juin 2019
17 juin 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, through the decision not to discontinue the foster care of her child
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196364
6 septembre 2019
6 septembre 2019
The applicant complains under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1: (a) that the domestic authorities’ decision was contrary to section 115(3) of the General Tax Act and section 2(3) of the related subordinate
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196601
10 septembre 2019
10 septembre 2019
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention taken together with Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207905
11 janvier 2021
11 janvier 2021
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 thereof?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206175
19 octobre 2020
19 octobre 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206794
25 novembre 2020
25 novembre 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect his private and family life as a result of the decision to deprive him of British nationality, contrary to Article 8 of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209118
9 mars 2021
9 mars 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of her physical characteristics, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218522
20 juin 2022
20 juin 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218710
6 juillet 2022
6 juillet 2022
Convention, that he did not have a fair hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, in that the two lay judges deciding his case were active members of political parties, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219615
9 septembre 2022
9 septembre 2022
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life and correspondence, contrary to Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234724
7 juin 2024
7 juin 2024
applicant submitted a constitutional complaint, in which he raised that the institutional reform – recommended to the Government by Judge X, then the President of the National Judicial Office – was contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214404
23 novembre 2021
23 novembre 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s rights to freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215189
14 décembre 2021
14 décembre 2021
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression, in particular its right to impart information, contrary to Article 10 of the
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13555
15 décembre 2021
15 décembre 2021
In addition, some of the applicants complain that their arrests, transfers to police stations and administrative detention were contrary to Article 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4102
25 novembre 2004
25 novembre 2004
In October 2003, the Minister for Immigration and Integration found that his illness had not reached a life-threatening stage which would render his expulsion contrary to Article 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4274
6 juillet 2004
6 juillet 2004
The Supreme Court noted that the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ meeting had not been forbidden by the authorities and was not contrary to public policy.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211657
27 juillet 2021
27 juillet 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his place of residence, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216855
15 mars 2022
15 mars 2022
The applicant alleges that it was reported that the authorities decided, on the basis of the medical evidence collected, that there was sexual intercourse but not rape and that this practice was contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193708
15 mai 2019
15 mai 2019
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? APPENDIX No.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242547
28 février 2025
28 février 2025
The applicants complain that their constitutional complaints were declared inadmissible as being lodged outside the four-month time-limit, contrary to the guarantees under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
Source officiellePage 55 sur 1005