CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1219DEC004682116
19 décembre 2024
In the proceedings before the Court the applicant company blamed the customs authorities (see paragraph 2 above), whereas in the domestic proceedings it admitted that it had been a self ‑ inflicted
Page 55 sur 123
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC001918704
26 janvier 2010
The Court notes that although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept that such actions
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0908DEC001388288
8 septembre 1992
As relatives and heirs, they could not be blamed for having addressed themselves to all possible authorities in order to have the alleged criminal offences prosecuted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0603DEC002013602
3 juin 2008
The prosecutor had regard to the case ‑ law of the Supreme Court concerning the scope of freedom of expression in judicial proceedings and considered that the applicant could not be blamed for defending
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0712JUD001855706
12 juillet 2007
The Court considers that the applicant cannot be blamed for refusing to settle for less than he was entitled to, under the judgment of 11 May 2004, as upheld on 21 July 2004 (cf. Kornev v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD007165717
14 novembre 2023
They applied the same blanket approach which the Court has found to be at odds with the respondent State’s obligation to ensure adequate protection of the applicants’ property rights, and to be tantamount
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1125JUD001662105
25 novembre 2010
However, it has been the Court’s constant approach that an applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by the national law in the defence of his interests (see, mutatis
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113DEC004688422
13 novembre 2025
The Ministry of Justice, although it has extremely little leverage to put pressure on the prosecution or the judiciary, is always blamed in the end. But I would like to say something.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD001906215
13 octobre 2022
The report further stated that during the examination the applicant was alert, aware of his surroundings, wordy but to the point; he tried to make a good impression; he denied any wrongdoing at home, blamed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1022JUD002403019
22 octobre 2024
Therefore, it appears that mandatory confiscation of items under Article 100 ‑ a (3) and (4) was not a blanket measure and it depended on other elements, for instance, whether a plaintiff
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD006837314
1 mars 2022
Her conclusion followed the statements that “the efficiency of the system of education was questioned” and that the teachers had been blamed that “they wallowed in the mud which wrapped up, in some ways
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109JUD004437202
9 novembre 2006
The Government contended that the Bailiffs' Service performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155558
27 mai 2015
Appeal noted that Mr Z’s testimony had been made on oath, and the list of jewellery drawn up with the assistance of an expert (despite him not having confirmed it on oath), thus, Mr Z could not be blamed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0305JUD004389819
5 mars 2026
He blamed the authorities for the frequent postponements of M.P.’s trial and the excessive overall duration of the criminal proceedings. 20 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD004624715
indicated on the form that she was “not working” (see paragraph 3 above), the appeal court interpreted this as a declaration that she was “not registered as an entrepreneur” (see paragraph 7 above) and blamed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0428JUD003078905
28 avril 2009
However, it is not convinced by this argument, especially in view of the blanket denial of the applicants’ locus standi as the company’s owners.
Cour d'Appel
6253cac0bd3db21cbdd8bf4f
27 juin 2008
BLASSEL DEBATS : à l'audience publique du 07 Mai 2008 ARRET : Contradictoire prononcé par sa mise à disposition au greffe le 27 Juin 2008, les parties présentes en ayant été préalablement avisées
6253ca57bd3db21cbdd8abde
29 février 2008
BLASSEL, greffier auquel la minute de la décision a été remise par le magistrat signataire. FAITS ET PROCÉDURE Monsieur Emmanuel X... a été engagé par la S. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0716JUD005204513
16 juillet 2015
Further delays occurred owing to remittals of the case on appeal, for which the applicant also cannot be blamed (see Wierciszewska v. Poland , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1120DEC005864700
20 novembre 2003
Considering the short period of time between the decisions of the Constitutional Court and the IAP, the applicant may not be blamed for the failure to request to hold a further hearing in the second set