CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 445 résultats pour « Blavet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1219DEC004682116

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2024

19 décembre 2024

In the proceedings before the Court the applicant company blamed the customs authorities (see paragraph 2 above), whereas in the domestic proceedings it admitted that it had been a self ‑ inflicted

Page 55 sur 123

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC001918704

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2010

26 janvier 2010

The Court notes that although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept that such actions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0908DEC001388288

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 1992

8 septembre 1992

  As relatives and heirs, they could not be blamed for having addressed themselves to all possible authorities in order to have the alleged criminal offences prosecuted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0603DEC002013602

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2008

3 juin 2008

The prosecutor had regard to the case ‑ law of the Supreme Court concerning the scope of freedom of expression in judicial proceedings and considered that the applicant could not be blamed for defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0712JUD001855706

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2007

12 juillet 2007

The Court considers that the applicant cannot be blamed for refusing to settle for less than he was entitled to, under the judgment of 11 May 2004, as upheld on 21 July 2004 (cf. Kornev v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD007165717

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2023

14 novembre 2023

They applied the same blanket approach which the Court has found to be at odds with the respondent State’s obligation to ensure adequate protection of the applicants’ property rights, and to be tantamount

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1125JUD001662105

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2010

25 novembre 2010

However, it has been the Court’s constant approach that an applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by the national law in the defence of his interests (see, mutatis

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113DEC004688422

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2025

13 novembre 2025

The Ministry of Justice, although it has extremely little leverage to put pressure on the prosecution or the judiciary, is always blamed in the end. But I would like to say something.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD001906215

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2022

13 octobre 2022

The report further stated that during the examination the applicant was alert, aware of his surroundings, wordy but to the point; he tried to make a good impression; he denied any wrongdoing at home, blamed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1022JUD002403019

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2024

22 octobre 2024

Therefore, it appears that mandatory confiscation of items under Article   100 ‑ a (3) and (4) was not a blanket measure and it depended on other elements, for instance, whether a plaintiff

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD006837314

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2022

1 mars 2022

Her conclusion followed the statements that “the efficiency of the system of education was questioned” and that the teachers had been blamed that “they wallowed in the mud which wrapped up, in some ways

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109JUD004437202

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

The Government contended that the Bailiffs' Service performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155558

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2015

27 mai 2015

Appeal noted that Mr Z’s testimony had been made on oath, and the list of jewellery drawn up with the assistance of an expert (despite him not having confirmed it on oath), thus, Mr Z could not be blamed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0305JUD004389819

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2026

5 mars 2026

He blamed the authorities for the frequent postponements of M.P.’s trial and the excessive overall duration of the criminal proceedings. 20 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD004624715

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2025

13 novembre 2025

indicated on the form that she was “not working” (see paragraph 3 above), the appeal court interpreted this as a declaration that she was “not registered as an entrepreneur” (see paragraph 7 above) and blamed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0428JUD003078905

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2009

28 avril 2009

However, it is not convinced by this argument, especially in view of the blanket denial of the applicants’ locus standi as the company’s owners.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cac0bd3db21cbdd8bf4f

Appel

27 juin 2008

27 juin 2008

BLASSEL DEBATS : à l'audience publique du 07 Mai 2008 ARRET : Contradictoire prononcé par sa mise à disposition au greffe le 27 Juin 2008, les parties présentes en ayant été préalablement avisées

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253ca57bd3db21cbdd8abde

Appel

29 février 2008

29 février 2008

BLASSEL, greffier auquel la minute de la décision a été remise par le magistrat signataire. FAITS ET PROCÉDURE Monsieur Emmanuel X... a été engagé par la S. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0716JUD005204513

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2015

16 juillet 2015

Further delays occurred owing to remittals of the case on appeal, for which the applicant also cannot be blamed (see Wierciszewska v. Poland , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1120DEC005864700

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2003

20 novembre 2003

Considering the short period of time between the decisions of the Constitutional Court and the IAP, the applicant may not be blamed for the failure to request to hold a further hearing in the second set

Source officielle