CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 753 résultats pour « Alexandre Cano »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD000200009

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2017

6 avril 2017

This can involve compensation for both the loss actually suffered ( damnum emergens ) and the loss, or diminished gain, to be expected in the future ( lucrum cessans ). 34.

Page 55 sur 88

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1204JUD004714306

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2015

4 décembre 2015

    It can be seen from a document submitted by the applicant that in January 2007 an NGO, Civilian Control, asked the Prosecutor General’s Office to carry out an inspection of the Ministry of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC002780316

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2017

27 juin 2017

In the circumstances of the present case, it cannot be said that the same considerations would have applied irrespective of the provision invoked. 42.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0615JUD002954510

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2017

15 juin 2017

And in civil matters one can scarcely conceive of the rule of law without there being a possibility of having access to the courts (see, among many other authorities, Golder v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122JUD003612206

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2011

22 novembre 2011

The air inside is stale and the cell cannot be naturally ventilated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1030JUD002286705

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2012

30 octobre 2012

Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD002832803

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2012

10 mai 2012

Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD002754005

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922DEC006832013

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2020

22 septembre 2020

However, the Court considers that its analysis cannot stop there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;OPINIONS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-6380464-8364383

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2019

10 avril 2019

  The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of:   Guido Raimondi, President ,   Angelika Nußberger,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Robert Spano,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524DEC003630910

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

Section 38   (1) Exclusion can be also sought by the parties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0228JUD001846906

Admin. suprême

28 février 2012

28 février 2012

    The appellate court’s decision can be appealed against to the higher court (the cassation court) within three days.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108DEC001540504

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2013

8 janvier 2013

2013 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0411JUD002667606

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2013

11 avril 2013

    Lastly, the Court cannot but note that the plans of the cells submitted by the Government show that in each cell a substantial part of the surface was occupied by sleeping bunks.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609DEC007443514

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2020

9 juin 2020

A   sanction or other measure taken by an employer against an employed journalist can amount to an interference with freedom of expression (see Fuentes Bobo v. Spain , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0318JUD004900114

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2021

18 mars 2021

It further notes that the loss that occurred cannot be seen as inevitable.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC003014396

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

Alexander Wanke, lawyer of Czerwenka & Partners in Vienna.        The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0629JUD001469610

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2023

29 juin 2023

In this respect, the Court notes that – as the Government themselves have recognised – that payment was made in respect of different expropriation proceedings and, as a consequence, it cannot be taken

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0908DEC006219300

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2005

8 septembre 2005

The five individual applicants, Mr   Boris Petkov Borisov, Mr Georgi Alexandrov Kirilov, Ms Iskra Borisova Mladenova, Mr Tassi Tsenov Tassev and Mr Petko Borisov Traikov are Bulgarian nationals who

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1012JUD002175915

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2017

12 octobre 2017

In the absence of such explanation, the Court can draw inferences which may be unfavourable for the Government.

Source officielle