Composition of the Court   The case will be heard by a Chamber composed as follows:   Françoise Tulkens (Belgium), President , Ireneu Cabral Barreto (Portugual), Vladimiro Zagrebelsky

  The case will be heard by the Grand Chamber composed as follows:       Jean-Paul Costa (France), President , Christos Rozakis (Greece), Françoise Tulkens (Belgium), Ireneu Cabral

Turkey (dec.), no. 29870/96, 25   May 2000, and mutadis mutandis , Satık v. Turkey (no. 2) , no.   60999/00, § 39, 8 July 2008). 13.

Turkey (no. 2), no. 60999/00, §   39, 8   July 2008, and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 29870/96, 25 May 2000). 13.

Turkey (no. 74657/01), judgment of 18 December 2007 Evcimen v. Turkey (no. 21865/02), judgment of 29 December 2007   K.Ö v. Turkey (no. 71795/01), judgment of 11 December 2007 Köseoğlu v.

  The decision also noted that the father was still running the company in Turkey.

  Turkey ((dec.), no. 29870/96, 25 May 2000), and Tanışma v.   Turkey (no. 32219/05, §§ 29-47, 17 November 2015). THE LAW I.

sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2002)142 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 July 2001 in the case of Ertuğrul against Turkey

Turkey [GC], no.   36391/02, ECHR 2008; Özcan Çolak v. Turkey , no. 30235/03, §§   47-50, 6   October 2009; Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.

s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } Resolution ResDH(2003)187 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 March 2002 (Friendly settlement) in the case of İ.S. against Turkey

0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } Resolution ResDH(2003)186 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 12 December 2002 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Çallı against Turkey

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2005)17 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 July 2003 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Gür against Turkey

0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2005)40 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 26 June 2003 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Hattatoğlu against Turkey

Turkey 24/06/2019 Hasan YÜCEL 10/10/1952 İzmir Turkish Abdülaziz DİKE 2. 41241/19 Düzenli v. Turkey 23/07/2019 Ataman DÜZENLİ 10/08/1951 Ankara Turkish Önder PERÇİN 3. 41418/19 Güngör v.

  Turkey , no.   13062/03, §§ 14-20, 17 January 2006; Yerebasmaz v.   Turkey , no.   14710/03, §§ 24-26, 10 October 2006; Ak v. Turkey , no.

Turkey , 27 July 1998, §§ 63-83, Reports 1998 ‑ IV; Kılıç v.   Turkey , no. 22492/93, §   75, ECHR 2000 ‑ III; Mahmut Kaya v.   Turkey , no.

  Under Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention he submits that the proceedings in Turkey lasted too long and were unfair.

B..., représenté par Me Turkmen, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 4 novembre 2025 par lequel la préfète du Rhône a prononcé son expulsion du territoire français et a fixé le pays de renvoi