CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

5 834 résultats pour « Guilhers »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55732

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 1999

8 octobre 1999

In addition, the Government of the Netherlands was to pay to the applicant, ex gratia , the sum of 21   480 Dutch guilders ex VAT for legal costs incurred in the proceedings before the European Commission

Source officielle

Page 54 sur 292

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3209

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2006

27 juin 2006

The Hungarian court did not make any fresh assessment of the applicant’s guilt, accepted the Swedish courts’ findings and converted the sentence into ten years’ imprisonment in conformity with Hungarian

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1154

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

political climate in which the trial had taken place, the legislative reforms proposed by the Government and the applicant’s defence strategy, but did not make any pronouncements as to the applicant’s guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC005875609

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2013

1 octobre 2013

defendant in the Turkish criminal system is against the principle of equality of arms and the admission of the indictment by the court indicates the partiality of the domestic court as it has prejudged the guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205601

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2020

28 septembre 2020

In particular, did the Supreme Court assess the applicant’s guilt, in whole or in part, by re-assessing the evidentiary value of testimony provided by the accused and witnesses before the District Court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141731

Admin. suprême

14 février 2014

14 février 2014

One of the arguments mentioned in the reasoning of the decision was that the simple submission of a medical certificate to the court does not prove the guilt of the defendant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218823

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2022

8 juillet 2022

applicant complained to the police, who did not undertake meaningful investigative steps about it for about two years until 22   August 2018, when the accused person was questioned and confessed his guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7387

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

In dismissing that complaint, the Constitutional Court held that that power could not be equated with the powers of a judge, as the public prosecutor had no control over the finding of guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2655

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2007

28 juin 2007

Law : The applicant had been coerced into making confession statements and the two witnesses into making statements substantiating his guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123187

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2013

1 juillet 2013

COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the length of proceedings initiated by the applicant in order to exonerate her late son from any finding of guilt.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68370-68838

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2001

24 avril 2001

  The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which 6,302.75 Netherlands Guilders inclusive of costs and expenses is to be paid to the applicant on an ex gratia basis.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177837

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2017

22 septembre 2017

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention that the confiscation order, in the absence of a final judgment establishing her guilt, referred to her as a perpetrator and the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214870

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2021

9 décembre 2021

pre-trial decision in the case, namely on 6   December 2013 concerning the applicant’s detention on remand, in which they reasoned their judgment by making statements suggestive of the applicant’s guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-170427

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2016

7 décembre 2016

The court considered the applicant’s guilt to be proved by the following evidence: K.’s written statement and the explanations given by his colleagues, the report on the banknotes’ inspection and marking

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4519

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2004

27 janvier 2004

Article 6 § 3 (a) – The Assize Court informed the applicant of the accusation against him after it had already come to the conclusion of his guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1691

Admin. suprême

26 février 2009

26 février 2009

The officers searched the applicant, his bag and his vehicle and found 500,000 Netherlands guilders (EUR 233,056).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9882

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 1992

25 septembre 1992

necessity or as a result of unavoidable mistake - Court of Appeal had taken account of a cumulation of facts and had duly weighed the evidence before it, assessed it carefully and based its finding of guilt

Source officielle
CE

3ème et 8ème sous-sections réunies

CETAT:CETATEXT000027666357

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2013

5 juillet 2013

A...B..., Mye Maisoun - route de Guiche à Sames (64520), représentée par son président ; l'association demande au Conseil d'Etat : 1°) d'annuler pour excès de pouvoir l'arrêté du 2 mars 2012 fixant le

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245592

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2025

24 septembre 2025

impartial within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention when examining the applicant’s appeal, in view of the support expressed by its judges to a fellow judge having decided on the applicant’s guilt

Source officielle
CA

Chambre des étrangers

67de5767649c157196ef4659

Appel

8 août 2024

8 août 2024

suit, après débats à l'audience du même jour, concernant : PARTIES EN CAUSE : Monsieur [K] [Y] Actuellement au CHS DE [Localité 5] [Adresse 4] [Localité 3] Assisté par Me Hélène GUILLIER

Source officielle