CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55732
8 octobre 1999
In addition, the Government of the Netherlands was to pay to the applicant, ex gratia , the sum of 21 480 Dutch guilders ex VAT for legal costs incurred in the proceedings before the European Commission
Page 54 sur 292
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3209
27 juin 2006
The Hungarian court did not make any fresh assessment of the applicant’s guilt, accepted the Swedish courts’ findings and converted the sentence into ten years’ imprisonment in conformity with Hungarian
ECLI:CEDH:002-1154
8 décembre 2009
political climate in which the trial had taken place, the legislative reforms proposed by the Government and the applicant’s defence strategy, but did not make any pronouncements as to the applicant’s guilt
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC005875609
1 octobre 2013
defendant in the Turkish criminal system is against the principle of equality of arms and the admission of the indictment by the court indicates the partiality of the domestic court as it has prejudged the guilt
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205601
28 septembre 2020
In particular, did the Supreme Court assess the applicant’s guilt, in whole or in part, by re-assessing the evidentiary value of testimony provided by the accused and witnesses before the District Court
ECLI:CEDH:001-141731
14 février 2014
One of the arguments mentioned in the reasoning of the decision was that the simple submission of a medical certificate to the court does not prove the guilt of the defendant.
ECLI:CEDH:001-218823
8 juillet 2022
applicant complained to the police, who did not undertake meaningful investigative steps about it for about two years until 22 August 2018, when the accused person was questioned and confessed his guilt
ECLI:CEDH:002-7387
22 janvier 2013
In dismissing that complaint, the Constitutional Court held that that power could not be equated with the powers of a judge, as the public prosecutor had no control over the finding of guilt.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2655
28 juin 2007
Law : The applicant had been coerced into making confession statements and the two witnesses into making statements substantiating his guilt.
ECLI:CEDH:001-123187
1 juillet 2013
COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the length of proceedings initiated by the applicant in order to exonerate her late son from any finding of guilt.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68370-68838
24 avril 2001
The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which 6,302.75 Netherlands Guilders inclusive of costs and expenses is to be paid to the applicant on an ex gratia basis.
ECLI:CEDH:001-177837
22 septembre 2017
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention that the confiscation order, in the absence of a final judgment establishing her guilt, referred to her as a perpetrator and the
ECLI:CEDH:001-214870
9 décembre 2021
pre-trial decision in the case, namely on 6 December 2013 concerning the applicant’s detention on remand, in which they reasoned their judgment by making statements suggestive of the applicant’s guilt
ECLI:CEDH:001-170427
7 décembre 2016
The court considered the applicant’s guilt to be proved by the following evidence: K.’s written statement and the explanations given by his colleagues, the report on the banknotes’ inspection and marking
ECLI:CEDH:002-4519
27 janvier 2004
Article 6 § 3 (a) – The Assize Court informed the applicant of the accusation against him after it had already come to the conclusion of his guilt.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1691
26 février 2009
The officers searched the applicant, his bag and his vehicle and found 500,000 Netherlands guilders (EUR 233,056).
ECLI:CEDH:002-9882
25 septembre 1992
necessity or as a result of unavoidable mistake - Court of Appeal had taken account of a cumulation of facts and had duly weighed the evidence before it, assessed it carefully and based its finding of guilt
3ème et 8ème sous-sections réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000027666357
5 juillet 2013
A...B..., Mye Maisoun - route de Guiche à Sames (64520), représentée par son président ; l'association demande au Conseil d'Etat : 1°) d'annuler pour excès de pouvoir l'arrêté du 2 mars 2012 fixant le
ECLI:CEDH:001-245592
24 septembre 2025
impartial within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention when examining the applicant’s appeal, in view of the support expressed by its judges to a fellow judge having decided on the applicant’s guilt
Chambre des étrangers
67de5767649c157196ef4659
8 août 2024
suit, après débats à l'audience du même jour, concernant : PARTIES EN CAUSE : Monsieur [K] [Y] Actuellement au CHS DE [Localité 5] [Adresse 4] [Localité 3] Assisté par Me Hélène GUILLIER