and the MIA 1906 » ; que la compagnie MMIA verse par ailleurs un document rédigé en langue anglaise intitulé « rule book » qui mentionne, au chapitre rule 44, qu'en cas de différend non résolu entre les

They accordingly requested the revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

    The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule   52 §   1 of the Rules of Court).

    The application was allocated to the Fourth Section of the Court (Rule   52 §   1 of the Rules of Court).

or its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).

of crime – assertion of that right by applicants sufficient in itself to ensure applicability of Article 6 § 1 – domestic case-law confirms that exclusionary rule not regarded as absolute bar to such

. # Social security - Old-age pensions - Recalculation - Recovery of sums paid though not due - Limitation - Law applicable - Detailed procedural rules - Concept. # Case C-34/02.

. # Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Export refunds - Inaccurate declaration - Consequences for the validity of the declaration. # Case C-446

#Directive 86/653/EEC - Independent commercial agents - National rules providing that commercial agency contracts concluded by persons not entered on the register of agents are void.#Case C-215/97.

    The applicable rule 27.

    Rules on Registration of Civil Acts in Ukraine (approved by the Order no. 52/5 of the Ministry of Justice on 18 October 2000) By virtue of Rule 4.17-4.18 registration of marriage with convicts

Rule 44E of the Rules of Court provides that: “In accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, if an applicant Contracting Party or an individual applicant fails to pursue the application, the

The application was also given priority under Rule 41. 5.

39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having

On 6 July 2007 the President of the Chamber indicated to the Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court that the applicant be placed in the prison hospital where an appropriate treatment for his mental

On 7 August 2018 the Court decided to indicate to the respondent Government, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, that the applicant should not be extradited until further notice.

which had been acquired in violation of procedural rules could not be used in criminal proceedings.

They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

        On 23 March 1993 the President of the Commission decided, pursuant to Rule 36 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure, to indicate to the Government of Norway that