Yet, the rule is based on the assumption that the domestic system provides an effective remedy in respect of the alleged breach (see Radomilja and Others v.

    The applicant complained that he had had no effective remedy at his disposal in respect of his Convention complaints.

For the Court, it would be inconceivable that Article   13 provided the right to have a remedy, and for it to be effective, without protecting the implementation of remedies afforded.

  He states that not being a lawyer he was not aware of the available remedies.

other remedies – namely criminal and civil proceedings – seemed to be more appropriate than exercising the right of reply.

The applicant further contended that there had been no domestic remedy whatsoever available to him. 27.

Slovakia - 57983/00 Judgment 8.4.2003 [Section IV] Article 35 Article 35-1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Effective domestic remedy Effectiveness of remedy in respect of length of court proceedings Facts

Accordingly, they maintained that the applicants had not exhausted domestic remedies, as they had not made any application to the Compensation Commission. 12.

Accordingly, they maintained that the applicant had not exhausted domestic remedies, as he had not made any application to the Compensation Commission: this ground had also been recognised by the Court

, that is to say the new remedy.

, that is to say the new remedy.

Subsequently, in its decision in the case of Turgut and Others , cited above, the Court declared a new application inadmissible on the ground that the applicants had failed to exhaust domestic remedies

The applicant alleges that if extradited to Turkmenistan he would face a real risk of ill-treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, and complains that there are no effective remedies within the

remedies: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions).

.) - 46061/21 Decision 13.9.2022 [Section V] Article 35 Article 35-1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Application to Court without exercise of effective remedy of judicial review against orders suspending

    The Government submitted that the applicant company had not exhausted domestic remedies.

On that basis, they contend that the applicant has not exhausted domestic remedies as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention.

that the applicant had failed to exhaust domestic remedies in respect of his complaint of poor medical care.

As regards the effectiveness of the remedy the Government relied on the Court’s findings in Lukenda v. Slovenia , no. 23032/02, ECHR 2005 ‑ X.

Moreover, the right to an effective remedy in Article 13 ‘does not guarantee a right to legal counsel paid by the State when availing oneself of such a remedy’ unless the grant of such aid is warranted