In addressing the above questions the parties are invited to weigh the following considerations: whether the courts provided any reasoning for dismissing the motion to require submission of the video recording

MOTIFS Sur les circonstances insurmontables Le conseil de l’ordre du barreau de la Seine-Saint-Denis a adopté, dans sa séance du 31 mars 2026, une motion décrétant la grève générale du 1er au 13 avril

par le Docteur [R] le 03/04/2026 à 16h30 indiquant que l’audition du patient est impossible par téléphone, En l’absence de l’avocat de permanence régulièrement convoqué, gréviste conformément à la motion

Après avoir recueilli les observations de : - [W] [H], la personne faisant l’objet de soins psychiatriques, En l’absence de l’avocat de permanence régulièrement convoqué, gréviste conformément à la motion

Association ATMP - au directeur du groupe hospitalier du [Localité 2] - au procureur de la République du HAVRE ; En l’absence de l’avocat de permanence régulièrement convoqué, gréviste conformément à la motion

    The Chamber or, where appropriate, its President may, at the request of a party or of any other person concerned, or of its own motion, indicate to the parties any interim measure which it

  b)     Was the use by the Ministry of Justice, which had set in motion the criminal proceedings against the applicant, of the extraordinary remedy under Article 309 of the Code of Criminal

  Applicable criteria (a)   Complexity of the case Case undoubtedly complex: review of constitutionality extended by Federal Constitutional Court of its own motion to embrace another provision

  ARTICLE 6 § 2 OF THE CONVENTION Complaint not repeated before the Court —   no need for the Court to address the matter of its own motion (unanimously). III.

The trial court also refused to admit into evidence an expert report which the applicants had obtained on their own motion, the findings of which allegedly contradicted those of the report obtained in

The applicant complains, relying on Article 6 of the Convention, that the domestic courts failed to examine of their own motion whether the provisions of the Aliens Act which they had relied on had been

complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), the friendly settlement procedure being set in motion

the Code of Criminal Procedure, progress in proceedings depends entirely on the parties’ diligence; if the latter abandon the proceedings temporarily or definitively, the courts cannot of their own motion

The Court has already considered that the six-month rule is a public policy rule and that, consequently, it has jurisdiction to apply of its own motion, even if the Government have not raised that objection

On 22 June 2007, before the expiry of a standard maximum statutory time-limit of six months for the detention pending the trial, at the motion of the presiding judge of the Tbilisi City Court, the President

Furthermore, it decided, of its own motion, to deny the applicant any contact with his child. On 25 January 2017 the second instance court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.

On 26   June 2015 the court, of its own motion, reviewed its decision of 17   June 2015.

with the six-month time-limit established by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention given that the six-month rule is a public policy rule and that, consequently, it has jurisdiction to apply it of its own motion

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains invoking several provisions of the Convention (Articles 3, 5, 6, 13, 14 and 17) that his motions for release from the hospital were unsuccessful and that the proceedings