The Court held that the applicants in that case could not claim to have a legitimate expectation of pension rights going beyond the rights created by the German legislator following German Unification.

He is a retired businessman who receives a pension on the basis of mostly voluntary contributions to the German Employees' Old Age Insurance Scheme (gesetzliche Rentenversicherung der Angestellten).

However, the impugned measure did not alter the complainants’ position in the German legal order.

    Decisions of the German courts 11.

The Court further observes that the German courts considered both to be allegations of fact without further discussion.

    Situation after German reunification 16.

This region before and during the Second World War belonged to the German Reich.

       The applicant, born in 1971, is a German national and resident at Drakenburg.   He is employed in the German civil service.

normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  THE FACTS   Whereas the facts presented by the Applicant may be summarised as follows:   The Applicant is a German

The Applicant states that, during the occupation of Norway by the Germans, Article 43 of the Hague Regulations of 1907 applied and according to this provision the occupying power had the duty to ensure

  Germany and various follow-up cases, the German Federal Constitutional Court held in a judgment of 4   May 2011 that provisions on the retrospective prolongation of preventive detention were

It held that German law ruled out any contact rights.

          The first applicant lived in the German Democratic Republic until 1982.

société Office de transports européens et de courtage et à la société Axa corporate solutions assurance du désistement de leur pourvoi en ce qu'il est dirigé contre la société Aldex Kft et la société Gelbmann

    Relevant provision of the German Civil Code Section   1684 “1.

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Would the applicant’s expulsion to Turkey violate his right to respect for his private life and family life with his minor daughter, a German national, contrary to Article 8 of

  QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Would the applicant’s expulsion to Nigeria violate the applicant’s right to respect for his family life with his minor daughter, a German national, contrary to Article 8

Geslan-Demaret La République mande et ordonne au préfet de l'Aude en ce qui le concerne ou à tous huissiers de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre les parties privées

Geslan-Demaret La République mande et ordonne au préfet de l'Aude en ce qui le concerne ou à tous huissiers de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre les parties privées