CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

47 968 résultats pour « Ducuing »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156685

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2015

6 juillet 2015

(given during the investigation on 17 September 1996), B.C. (given during the investigation on 7 August 1996 and at the trial on 7 July 2008), S.V. and K.T.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2408375-2607488

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2008

3 juillet 2008

  The case concerned Mr Chember’s complaint that, during his military service, he was ordered to do excessive exercise which has left him disabled.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202955

Admin. suprême

14 avril 2020

14 avril 2020

The District Court also stated that the applicant had failed to take any action to establish her paternal filiation either during K.’s lifetime or during the three years after his death.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0104DEC000513804

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2008

4 janvier 2008

The applicant joined the PKK [1] in 1995 and was arrested during a military operation carried out by the Turkish armed forces on 27 April 1998.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3167919-3524879

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2010

15 juin 2010

  Article 6 §§ 1 and 2   The Court disapproved of such an indiscriminate and humiliating security measure as used during the appeal proceedings in the applicant’s case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146038

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2014

7 juillet 2014

The applicant underlines that during his trial or detention he was never violent towards the prison guards or other persons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-124244

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2013

17 juillet 2013

During the appeal proceedings the case file was forwarded to the State Attorney’s Office of the Republic of Croatia ( Državno odvjetništvo Republike Hrvatske ), which lodged its reasoned opinion asking

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3751

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2005

26 juillet 2005

During the subsequent events, fifteen other persons were killed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144993

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2014

19 mai 2014

During the events described below he suffered from asthma. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189319

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2018

10 décembre 2018

The application also relates to the alleged absence of the applicant’s lawyer during the investigative measures, such as the reconstruction of the events ( yer gösterme ) and the identification procedure

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175721

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2017

27 juin 2017

: “Should Leningrad have been surrendered in order to save hundreds of thousands of people [who died during the blockade]?”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214845

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2021

9 décembre 2021

During the examination of the scene of the incident it was established that the gun had been in full fire mode.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180611

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2018

11 janvier 2018

The applicants state that despite their motions to be present during the first instance and appeal hearings they were not transferred from the detention facility to the hearings. COMPLAINTS 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167684

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2016

21 septembre 2016

The assize court further observed that during the speeches made by the accused, the crowd had chanted slogans in favour of the PKK and its leader.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-8942

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2013

31 octobre 2013

The Court did not lose sight of the applicant’s argument that his legal representation during the first questioning would have ensured the proper documenting of his surrender to the police and its further

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206668

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2020

16 novembre 2020

On 23 July 2017 during the search in the applicant’s residence 89 grams of dry cannabis were discovered. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238121

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2024

21 octobre 2024

During the session, after mentioning the guardian’s alleged harassment, the applicant stated that he had been trained as a navy commando, that he was well-trained in infighting and that he had the capacity

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231578

Admin. suprême

16 février 2024

16 février 2024

The first-instance court upheld the plaintiffs’ request as regards holding a strike and defined the minimum services to be maintained during the strike days.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177586

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2017

14 septembre 2017

The application also concerns the lack of adequate time provided to the applicant to prepare his defence following the introduction of new evidence during the final stages of the trial and the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10823

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2016

12 janvier 2016

pre-trial investigations: violation Facts – Before 2010 Maltese law did not provide for legal assistance during pre-trial investigations and questioning.

Source officielle

Page 53 sur 2399

← PrécédentSuivant →