The child nevertheless remained in public care.

After hearing the child, the Family Court had ordered contact with the applicant.

On 5   June 2018 the domestic courts awarded custody of the child to the mother, and the applicant was granted contact rights.

pour le renouvellement des membres du conseil municipal ; 2°) annule ces opérations électorales ; 3°) annule l'élection du maire de Chailly-en-Bière qui s'est déroulée le 18 mars 2001 dans cette commune

Mme C soutient qu'elle ne peut pas voyager au Chili avec un récépissé de demande de titre de séjour.

In October 1995 the mother took the child to Austria without the first applicant's consent.

However, the mother took the child to the Czech Republic without the applicant’s consent.

If a child was born during a marriage, or within three hundred days from its termination or annulment, it will be presumed that he/she is the child of the mother’s husband.

Law – Article   8: The applicants’ desire to use medically-assisted procreation and embryo screening to have a child not infected with the genetic disease of which they were healthy carriers was a

and a one in two chance that their child would be a carrier.

Hungary - 29617/07 Judgment 12.2.2013 [Section II] Article 14 Discrimination Total removal of applicant’s access rights on account of his attempts to transmit his religious beliefs to his child: violation

In that respect, it considered that the courts should not have been satisfied with the vague statements of an expert about the risks inherent in questioning the child.

provide maintenance ( levensonderhoud ) for the child until the child has come of age.

    Under section 4-12 of the 1992 Child Welfare Act ( barnevernloven ), a child may be taken into public care if there are serious deficiencies in the daily care of the child or in relation

    The Court finds that in principle only a parent who has the custody over his or her child is able to introduce an application under Article 25 of the Convention on behalf of the child (see

(Norway)     On 09/03/2012 the first applicant’s child (a girl who was born in 2009) was placed in emergency care after the child welfare services had received several notifications of concern

The opinion recommended child welfare measures with a view to protecting the child. 45.

The opinion recommended child welfare measures with a view to protecting the child.