CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202JUD002294713
2 février 2016
disclosure of confidential information, its duty is nevertheless to impart – in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities – information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see Bladet
Page 53 sur 123
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0406JUD000680606
6 avril 2010
Belgium , 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD000797209
2 octobre 2018
Iceland , 25 June 1992, § 63, Series A no. 239, and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-III). 40.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605DEC002438710
5 juin 2018
Journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0206JUD004120598
6 février 2001
Belgium , judgment of 24 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, pp. 233-34, § 37; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019JUD003503013
19 octobre 2017
The latter issue must be determined in the light of the situation as it presented itself to the newspaper at the material time (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD005367800
16 novembre 2004
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0301JUD000051004
1 mars 2007
As regards the European Court's case-law, I refer to the judgment of 20 May 1999 in Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway (no 21980/93), § 66, and to the judgment of 7 May 2002 in McVicar v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0211JUD004819506
11 février 2010
He also blamed them for the lamentable conditions in vocational schools. B. Defamation proceedings 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD007887313
11 janvier 2022
During his presentation, he blamed certain journalists for lowering the standards of journalism in the country, and he drew attention to the fact that the political and judicial classes were utilising
8ème chambre 2ème section
69d7f9dacdc6046d47af1c60
9 avril 2026
Assignation du : 24 Février 2023 JUGEMENT rendu le 09 Avril 2026 DEMANDEUR La société [N], SNC, prise en la personne de son représentant légal [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représenté par Maître Jean-pierre BLATTER
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD002126304
19 février 2009
The Court further notes that, although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0703JUD003694902
3 juillet 2008
The Court further recalls that, although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1822820-1923505
31 octobre 2006
Consequently the Court found that the travel ban was effectively an automatic, blanket measure of indefinite duration and, as such, ran contrary to the authorities' duty to take appropriate care that any
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0702DEC007657301
2 juillet 2002
police fingerprinting experts advised that it was necessary to remove the hands to obtain the fingerprints, the police proceeded on 24 and 25 August to remove the hands from the victims’ bodies on a blanket
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213JUD002546303
13 décembre 2005
The Government further maintained that the Bailiffs’ Service had performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay. The applicant disagreed. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD001051503
10 août 2006
The Government contended that the Bailiffs’ Service performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0910DEC003123396
10 septembre 1997
Furthermore, the Guardianship's Office cannot be blamed that they wish at all costs to withdraw guardianship from the parents: Even &
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1130DEC002590394
30 novembre 1999
However, most of these appeals were successful and the applicant cannot be blamed for having lodged them. The Court finds that no delays can be attributed to the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0119DEC001304087
19 janvier 1989
To this extent the present case can be distinguished from the Silver and others case, in which the Commission and the Court considered that the stopping of letters on the basis of a blanket prohibition