CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 445 résultats pour « Blavet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202JUD002294713

Admin. suprême

2 février 2016

2 février 2016

disclosure of confidential information, its duty is nevertheless to impart – in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities – information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see Bladet

Page 53 sur 123

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0406JUD000680606

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2010

6 avril 2010

Belgium , 24   February   1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.   21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD000797209

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2018

2 octobre 2018

Iceland , 25 June 1992, §   63, Series   A no. 239, and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.   21980/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-III). 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605DEC002438710

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2018

5 juin 2018

Journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0206JUD004120598

Admin. suprême

6 février 2001

6 février 2001

Belgium , judgment of 24   February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, pp. 233-34, § 37; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.   21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019JUD003503013

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2017

19 octobre 2017

The latter issue must be determined in the light of the situation as it presented itself to the newspaper at the material time (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD005367800

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2004

16 novembre 2004

Belgium , judgment of 24 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, pp. 233-34, § 37; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.   21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0301JUD000051004

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2007

1 mars 2007

As regards the European Court's case-law, I refer to the judgment of 20 May 1999 in Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.   Norway (no 21980/93), § 66, and to the judgment of 7 May 2002 in McVicar v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0211JUD004819506

Admin. suprême

11 février 2010

11 février 2010

He also blamed them for the lamentable conditions in vocational schools. B.     Defamation proceedings 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD007887313

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2022

11 janvier 2022

During his presentation, he blamed certain journalists for lowering the standards of journalism in the country, and he drew attention to the fact that the political and judicial classes were utilising

Source officielle
TJ

8ème chambre 2ème section

69d7f9dacdc6046d47af1c60

T. Judiciaire

9 avril 2026

9 avril 2026

Assignation du : 24 Février 2023 JUGEMENT rendu le 09 Avril 2026 DEMANDEUR La société [N], SNC, prise en la personne de son représentant légal [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représenté par Maître Jean-pierre BLATTER

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD002126304

Admin. suprême

19 février 2009

19 février 2009

    The Court further notes that, although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0703JUD003694902

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2008

3 juillet 2008

    The Court further recalls that, although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1822820-1923505

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2006

31 octobre 2006

Consequently the Court found that the travel ban was effectively an automatic, blanket measure of indefinite duration and, as such, ran contrary to the authorities' duty to take appropriate care that any

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0702DEC007657301

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2002

2 juillet 2002

police fingerprinting experts advised that it was necessary to remove the hands to obtain the fingerprints, the police proceeded on 24 and 25 August to remove the hands from the victims’ bodies on a blanket

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213JUD002546303

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2005

13 décembre 2005

The Government further maintained that the Bailiffs’ Service had performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.     The applicant disagreed. 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD001051503

Admin. suprême

10 août 2006

10 août 2006

The Government contended that the Bailiffs’ Service performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0910DEC003123396

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 1997

10 septembre 1997

      Furthermore, the Guardianship's Office cannot be blamed that they       wish at all costs to withdraw guardianship from the parents: Even  &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1130DEC002590394

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 1999

30 novembre 1999

However, most of these appeals were successful and the applicant cannot be blamed for having lodged them. The Court finds that no delays can be attributed to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0119DEC001304087

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 1989

19 janvier 1989

  To this extent the present case can be distinguished from the Silver and others case, in which the Commission and the Court considered that the stopping of letters on the basis of a blanket prohibition

Source officielle