Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
4ème chambre
69ea5a36cdc6046d474ab2b7
23 octobre 2025
23 octobre 2025
PRONONCE LE 23 Octobre 2025 4ème CHAMBRE DEMANDEUR ASS CONGES INTEMPERIES BTP CAISSE DE L'ILE DE FRANCE [Adresse 1] comparant par Me [F] [S] AJUELOS [Adresse 2] [Courriel 1] DEFENDEUR SASU ALLIANCE WIRES
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC003900602
27 janvier 2009
27 janvier 2009
In the proceedings before the Court he was represented by Ms Marina Nikolayevna Rembezi, his wife. The respondent Government were represented by its Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5398
25 avril 2002
25 avril 2002
hearing Oral hearing Lack of oral hearing at first instance: inadmissible The applicant brought two actions, the first an application to set aside a will drafted by his late father in favour of his second wife
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-170237
7 décembre 2016
7 décembre 2016
The applicant and his wife divorced on 21 August 2006 pursuant to a court-approved agreement between the two of them.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200960
14 janvier 2020
14 janvier 2020
against Russia lodged on 19 December 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the arrest of Mr D. by the police on 9 May 2010 in Lipetsk, in the course of which both applicants – D.’s wife
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC006422013
13 septembre 2018
13 septembre 2018
This letter was sent to the prison address and also to the address of the applicant’s wife in the Crimea. The applicant failed to reply and the letter to his wife returned undelivered.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1346
22 septembre 2009
22 septembre 2009
Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life Insufficient action by authorities to secure the return of a child abducted by her mother: violation Facts – The applicant, his wife
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202956
18 mai 2020
18 mai 2020
domestic violence had been a contributing factor in the victim’s death, and delivering a non-prosecution decision against the victim’s husband, who had himself confessed that he had been beating his wife
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1003DEC004486698
3 octobre 2000
3 octobre 2000
The applicants (husband and wife) were the subject of surveillance in error by a detective agency hired by an insurance company on about 25 occasions over three years.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243686
13 mai 2025
13 mai 2025
lodged on 3 April 2023 communicated on 13 May 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the refusal to appoint the applicant to a higher State Attorney’s Office essentially because his wife
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3708
13 octobre 2005
13 octobre 2005
Protocol No. 4 Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement Prohibition on leaving place of residence during criminal proceedings: no violation Facts : The applicants are husband and wife
Source officielle10ème Chambre
DTA_2202627_20221006
6 octobre 2022
6 octobre 2022
C F E, représenté par Me Wise, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 28 janvier 2022 par lequel le préfet des Hauts-de-Seine a refusé de lui délivrer un titre de séjour, l'a obligé à quitter
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0110DEC001453702
10 janvier 2006
10 janvier 2006
The applicant’s wife died on 13 January 1998. In 2002 the applicant applied to the Benefits Agency for the payment of social security benefits.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-736
30 novembre 2010
30 novembre 2010
In 2004 the applicant’s former wife sought to have the father deprived of parental responsibility and to have the contact arrangements suspended, alleging among other things that the applicant was undergoing
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116767
22 janvier 2013
22 janvier 2013
There he saw several persons in camouflage uniforms, as well as his mother and wife.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC004376106
24 mars 2009
24 mars 2009
His wife and son live in Finland, both of whom are Finnish citizens. At the time of the deportation, his son was ten years old.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0911DEC003109496
11 septembre 1997
11 septembre 1997
The applicant alleged that his brother's wife had not claimed the restitution of the villa because she had respected her husband's wish that the villa should belong to the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0314DEC004480098
14 mars 2000
14 mars 2000
On 22 December 1998 the Ombudsman found that the prison administration had censored a letter from the applicant to his wife in which he had accused the prison staff of theft.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC003030996
9 avril 1997
9 avril 1997
On 3 April 1994 his wife cross-petitioned.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0719JUD004124817
19 juillet 2022
19 juillet 2022
He was authorised to receive forty-eight short-term visits from members of his family (mother, father, sister and wife).
Source officiellePage 52 sur 606