It did not find it necessary to address whether the informal and unsolicited receipt of data carriers by a third party constituted a seizure or to what extent the protection from circumvention of the lawyer

Accordingly, the applicant had not inherited the land, but merely the right to complete the process of privatisation [2] . Consequently, the land had been privatised by another person and sold to L.

Nevertheless, in order to address the shortcomings identified by D.F., it ordered the applicant’s temporary hospitalisation.

Such teleological rather than merely textual interpretation of that provision was warranted by one of the basic principles of the Croatian legal order that rights could not be transferred without transferring

Accordingly, the Court holds that the Government’s objection that the applicants’ complaints are incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of Convention should be joined to the merits of their

When the applicant’s father returned later with other family members, he discovered that M.Y.’s family had left the address and that the children were no longer there.

Merits 18.

If the notion of “public-order offences that might have been committed” is viewed in the context of the search warrants as a whole, it is clear that it was used merely as shorthand for the specific offences

In that letter, the applicant's representative informed the police that the Dhanjis were in the United Kingdom and provided what was believed to be their temporary address in the United Kingdom.

Those were important considerations which the Upper Tribunal did not address.

-2- ENTRE : DEMANDEURS : Monsieur [O] [M] Madame [I] [J] épouse [M] [Adresse 9] [Adresse 9] représenté par Me Bertrand MERLY, avocat au barreau de RENNES, avocat plaidant ET : DEFENDEURS :

[S] est propriétaire au sein de la copropriété située [Adresse 8] et [Adresse 9] est de nature à permettre un apurement complet du passif, -le montant proposé par Mme [D] [S], co-indivisaire, est conforme

The Court heard addresses by Mr Moses for the Government, by Mr Gaukur Jörundsson for the Commission, by Mr Ashman for the applicant Thynne and by Mr Fitzgerald for the applicants Gunnell and Wilson.

The decision was sent to the applicant’s address in Jēkabpils.

2026 DÉCISION DÉFÉRÉE : 25/00028 Ordonnance du président du tribunal judiciaire de Dieppe du 25 juin 2025 APPELANTE : SAS EIFFAGE GÉNIE CIVIL RCS de [Localité 1] 352 745 749 [Adresse

The appellate court did not address any of the second applicant’s specific arguments. 29.

Unlike the situation in Glaisen (cited above), the present case does not concern merely one of several similar, privately run cultural venues.

  Merits of the complaint Recapitulation of case-law.

aware of it, and the date declared by the addressee will be considered the date of notification ( see for that provision also Hıdır Durmaz v.