Moreover, he argued that he could not be blamed for the behaviour of the other parties, and that he had had no effective remedy against the liquidator’s inactivity. The Court’s assessment 59.

    The circumstances of the case differ also from those examined in the context of the case of Johnston and Others (cited above), as it concerns neither a blanket restriction nor a blanket prohibition

He was tied up all night half naked, without any blankets (even though it was winter) or food and was not allowed to go to the toilet.

He claimed that he could not be blamed for not indicating that new address on the mortgage loan agreement with the bank, since the agreement had been signed several years before the housing permit had

Moreover, nine hearings were adjourned due to the failure of the defendants to appear, and the domestic authorities cannot be blamed for these delays.

  As to the applicant's absence at the hearing on 23 February 1987, the Federal Court found that he could not be blamed for this given that the hearing had been fixed at short notice.

He submitted that his relationship with his son had got considerably worse since February 2012 and blamed the mother’s behaviour.

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS   DECISION   AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF             Application No. 21980/93         by BLADET

    Lastly, the Government submitted that the present case was to be distinguished from that of Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.

Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of “public watchdog” (see, as a recent authority, Axel Springer AG , cited above, § 79; see also Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.

Belgium , 24   February   1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.   21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).

is to   be determined in the light of the situation as it presented itself to the applicant at the material time, rather than with the benefit of hindsight obtained a long time thereafter (see Bladet

Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of “public watchdog” (see, Axel Springer AG , cited above, § 79; see also Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.

  216; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.   Norway [GC], no.   21980/93, §   59, ECHR 1999-III). 56.

Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of “public watchdog” (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.

Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of “public watchdog” (Observer and Guardian, cited above, § 59; Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.

Belgium , 24   February   1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.   21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).

goes hand in hand with a European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see Bladet

particular circumstances of the case the Court would further have regard to the following elements, namely whether the the author of the publication could reasonably rely on an official report (see Bladet