The case concerned the alleged lack of medical care for the applicant’s human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during his detention in a prison between June 2006 and September 2007 as well as

The applicant complained under Articles 3 and 5 § 3 of the Convention about his arrest and pre-trial detention as well as of the conditions of his   detention.

The applicant complained under Articles 6, 13 and 14, as well as under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention about her civil proceedings for disturbance of a property.

The applicant complained under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention about the length of his pre-trial detention as well as the length of his criminal proceedings.

He relied on the Court’s judgments in James, Wells and Lee v. the United Kingdom , nos.   25119/09, 57715/09 and 57877/09, 18 September 2012, and Betteridge   v.

The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about the excessive length of the property-related civil proceedings, as well as about a lack of an effective remedy in that respect

Police officers tried to take D.’s wife to a police station as well. She was then requested to kneel before the police officers in exchange of them “allowing” her to stay with her daughter.

    The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention as well as under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the partial non-enforcement of the final Court

unfairness of certain criminal proceedings before military courts due the lack of impartiality of the military judges, the unlawfulness of the tapping of the applicant’s telephone communications as well

On 22 April 2010 the Court decided to communicate the applicant’s complaint concerning the length of criminal proceedings in which he was charged with bribes as well as the related complaint under Article

  By introducing this further development to its Internet site, the Court aims to make its case-law more easily accessible to those who are not well-versed in either English or French but who may

The unfair balance detected in the applicant’s case could subsequently give rise to other numerous well-founded applications which were a threat for the future effectiveness of the system put in place

Relying on Articles 3 and 14 of the Convention, the applicant complains about the lack of an effective official investigation into the alleged homophobic incident, as well as the fact that the Constitutional

this context, the Government are specifically requested to explain what kind of redress the applicant might obtain as a result of those proceedings in respect of his complaints under that Article, as well

The applicant complains about the alleged inhuman conditions of his detention in all three prisons, as well as in their medical units.

seised of the case under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaints concerning the length of certain criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages, as well

Given the ambiguity of that wording and the absence of a clear domestic judicial interpretation of the relevant provisions, as well as the existence of at least three domestic precedents where a court

For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website .

The present case concerned the subsequent decisions given by the German courts in the main proceedings confirming the withdrawal of applicants’ parental rights – except in respect of two children – as well

The Court of Appeal subsequently convicted the applicant, relying on the statements made by the anonymous witness to the investigating judge as well as various reports and official records.