Street) and the actual address of the building where the search had been conducted (4a V.

    Merits 1.     The parties’ submissions a)     The applicants 56.

. ; que, selon le plaignant, Me Maurice Y... aurait commis le délit de diffamation publique pour avoir adressé à chacun des membres du conseil municipal de Les Angles une lettre datée du 16 juillet 2001

Il en veut pour preuve le mail adressé le 16 mai 2011 par M.

    The police merely checked her and A.T.’s identity papers, and despite the applicant’s assertions that she had been threatened and beaten by her husband, they invited her to go home without

The evidence of the applicant’s relatives had been unjustifiably disregarded merely on the grounds that they were her relatives.

Junior Counsel was present throughout the hearing but did not address the court. Instead, the case was presented by RP and by Mr Hemming.

The applicant appealed against that judgment, but the judge, considering that his appeal was merely a statement within the meaning of Article 98 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, decided not to transmit

However, such prohibitions were not permissible if they merely served the purpose of protecting competitors.

the applicant as his places of residence in Russia between 1989 and 2002, no confirmation of the applicant’s registration and residence as of 6 February 1992 was received with respect to any of the addresses

#xa0;   As to compliance with the procedural law, the court was of the view that under the provisions of administrative law issuance of a certificate was not meant to confer any rights on the addressee

suspected of harassing pursuit by way of creating websites containing personal and demeaning information and photos about certain other persons and of distributing those websites via various email addresses

    The Court observes that the police officers’ statements merely confirmed the fact that a fight had taken place between the applicant and M.H., but did not indicate that the applicant had

The actions carried out by the employer during a competition were simply preliminary steps for the creation of an employment relationship; they could not be challenged before the courts but merely before

In particular, the option of restricting merely longer absences from the assigned district and authorising shorter absences without prior permission could not be controlled in practice and would entail

In addition, in the Government’s view, by complaining of a violation of his right to respect for his home when no search had been conducted at his home but in an apartment merely owned by him, and by presenting

It merely authorised the second applicant to use specified premises and the other applicants to be present on the site in order to perform helper duties (see paragraph 2 above).

Merits 20.     The relevant domestic law is set out in Delijorgji v. Albania, no.   6858/11, §§ 39-50, 28 April 2015, and Hysa v.

    Procedure and composition of the Court   The application was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 15 July 2002 and was examined for admissibility and merits at the same