The decisions of the selection officer cum head of the Bureau for the Coordination of Matters Concerning Aliens (a)     The first decision 14.

On an unspecified date in February or March 2010 the investigators questioned the head of the Ingushetia Government, Mr Vorobyev, who stated that on 7 or 8 February 2010 he had informed the head of the

on the top of the head.

They also put a gas mask on his head, cut the air flow, strangled him and administered electric shocks to his body.

the left kidney, multiple bruising of the head, body and extremities.

/04/2009 at 16:10 the applicant’s flat, 25/2 Kommunis-ticheskiy avenue-6, Rostov-on-Don FSKN (federal drugs control service) Rostov broken rib on the right, concussion, missing tooth, bruises on the head

In a decision of 31 July 2008 the head of the internal security department stated that there was evidence in the applicant’s actions of a criminal offence punishable under Article 290 § 2 of the Russian

kicked and punched on the head, nose and mouth, causing one of his teeth to break.

He received several wounds on his head, as well as other injuries. He was further brought to a hospital where he received the first aid.

In particular, the applicants allege that a verbal altercation with the head of the Kharagauli police department on 18 November 2018 erupted into their physical and verbal assault, which continued, after

A copy of her complaint was sent to the head of the Lazarevskiy office who sued the applicant in defamation and also instituted criminal proceedings against her for libel.

Relying on Article 3 of the Convention under its both heads, substantive and procedural, the applicant complains that he was unlawfully assaulted by a police officer and subjected to inhuman and degrading

October 2023 communicated on 9 February 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the police caution ( ammonimento ) imposed on the applicant in stalking-prevention proceedings by the head

    Was Article 6 of the Convention applicable to the proceedings in the present case under its civil or criminal head (see Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v.

disproportionate interference with the right to respect for the applicant’s private life on account of an interception of his telephone conversations ordered on 16 November 2010 on the ground that being a head

    Was Article   6 §   1 of the Convention under its civil head applicable to the proceedings in the applicant’s case?   2.

  QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Was Article   6 §   1 of the Convention under its civil head applicable to the judicial-review proceedings initiated by the applicant company?

As confirmed by the Dnipropetrovsk city hospital’s records, on that date the applicant was brought to the hospital on account of a head wound and had it sutured.

  In the afternoon of 4 November 2000, an ambulance was called to give emergency medical aid to Vitalie Levinţa who suffered notably from bruises on his face and head, and head trauma.