140   000 Netherlands guilders, in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as cost and expenses, within three months as from the notification of the judgment;   Recalling that Rule

courts;   - the aforementioned sum would be paid by the Portuguese Government immediately following the decision of the European Court of Human Rights to strike the case out of its list pursuant to Rule

39 of the Rules of Court (interim measures)] and 2) to ensure prompt and unconditional release of four Georgian minors in custody of the proxy regime in Tskhinvali Region/South Ossetia.”

sum at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank plus three percentage points from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement   Recalling that Rule

On 10 May 2021, pursuant to a request lodged by the applicant on 7 May 2021 under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, the Court indicated to the United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) that the applicant

28 of the Rules of Court) and the decision of the Bulgarian Government to designate the judge elected in respect of “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, as ad hoc

43, paragraph 3, of the Rules of the Court (old Rule 44, paragraph 2) provides that the striking-out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee

  39 of the Rules of Court).

sum at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank plus three percentage points from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement;   Recalling that Rule

The application was initially allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule   52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).

Bois, société par actions simplifiée, dont le siège est [Adresse 2], venant aux droits de la société Rullier Poitiers, défenderesse à la cassation.

    The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule   52 §   1 of the Rules of Court).

rule) laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention have been satisfied.

; 62   §   3 of the Rules of Court). 15.

    On 31 October 2017 the applicant lodged a request under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court asking the Court to prevent his extradition to Egypt. 18.

the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 30). 4.

Under Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court the Court decided that the applicants’ names should not be disclosed to the public. 2.     The applicants were represented by Mr A.

  (b)   The 1972 Rules     Rule 4 of the 1972 Rules provides that when a person is detained by a military authority, his Commanding Officer shall, unless it is impracticable, within

Jočienė, the judge elected in respect of Lithuania, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). The Government accordingly appointed Ms I.

The applicant was therefore invited to appoint a lawyer and submit a letter of authority for his representation before the Court by 30   May 2005, as required by Rule 36 §§ 2 and 4(a) of the Rules