CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0619DEC004616599
19 juin 2003
The person having custody of the child shall determine the father’s right of access to the child. Article 1634 § 1, second sentence, applies by analogy. 2.
Page 50 sur 385
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182182
13 mars 2018
As a result, in a decision of 3 December 2010 the Szob Guardianship Authority reduced the applicant’s contact with the child to the extent that his visits were to take place on the premises of the child
8ème chambre
DTA_2107055_20240221
21 février 2024
Elle fait valoir que : - l'habilitation à ester de la personne physique qui représente la société Chill and ride wakepark ne peut être vérifiée ; - la requête de la société Chill and ride wakepark
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0530JUD003414196
30 mai 2006
As the overall aim of child welfare is to protect the child and ascertain the best interests of the child, the social welfare authorities shall ensure that the care plan corresponds to this aim.
ECLI:CEDH:001-160653
16 janvier 2016
These included swaddling ( pucken ) a child from birth until the age of around three, involving wrapping the child up very tightly to suppress any urge to move.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-101024
15 septembre 2010
When ordering such access, the competent court may, under the 2003 law, decide that visits to the child by the bereft parent should be supervised by a person accompanying the child, in order to prevent
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0406DEC007206417
6 avril 2023
of the child which had been adopted in the course of proceedings between the parents.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD005462819
11 janvier 2022
The case concerns an allegation of international child abduction and the domestic courts’ decisions, under Article 8 of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-110068
3 février 2012
The applicant was permitted to see her daughter in the presence of the child care authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504JUD002738020
4 mai 2023
Subsequently, the applicant met with the child on 13 September 2019 and was also informed when the child moved to another place of residence. 4 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1007JUD005241118
7 octobre 2021
The child continued to live with S, who is the mother of the child. 6.
ECLI:CEDH:001-216783
11 mars 2022
I.T. never sought to establish his paternity in respect of the child. In 2020 I.T. abducted the child. The first applicant sought to have criminal proceedings instituted against him, in vain.
ECLI:CEDH:001-193708
15 mai 2019
After the husband had been granted subsidiary protection in the Netherlands in 2010, his wife and oldest child were given permission to join him in October 2013 for purposes of refugee ‑ family
ECLI:CEDH:001-242670
12 mars 2025
F1 continued to have contact with the child, whom he treated as his own.
ECLI:CEDH:001-202143
4 mars 2020
According to the applicant, in the relevant proceedings the courts failed to give due consideration to the best interest of the child, had not duly examined the existence of the exceptions provided by
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909DEC005627117
9 septembre 2021
Under section 4-12 of the 1992 Child Welfare Act ( barnevernloven ) a child may be taken into public care if there are serious deficiencies in the daily care of the child or in relation to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC000531312
22 octobre 2019
It was noted that relations between the child and the father had improved. 17.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0409DEC001828091
9 avril 1992
of that child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD005767818
1 juillet 2021
The child welfare services were authorised to supervise the contact sessions. 21.
ECLI:CEDH:001-147104
15 septembre 2014
If a child was born during a marriage, or within three hundred days from its termination or annulment, it will be presumed that he/she is the child of the mother’s husband.