CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

7 691 résultats pour « Chilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0619DEC004616599

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2003

19 juin 2003

    The person having custody of the child shall determine the father’s right of access to the child. Article 1634 § 1, second sentence, applies by analogy. 2.

Source officielle

Page 50 sur 385

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182182

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2018

13 mars 2018

As a result, in a decision of 3 December 2010 the Szob Guardianship Authority reduced the applicant’s contact with the child to the extent that his visits were to take place on the premises of the child

Source officielle
TA

8ème chambre

DTA_2107055_20240221

Administratif

21 février 2024

21 février 2024

Elle fait valoir que : - l'habilitation à ester de la personne physique qui représente la société Chill and ride wakepark ne peut être vérifiée ; - la requête de la société Chill and ride wakepark

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0530JUD003414196

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2006

30 mai 2006

As the overall aim of child welfare is to protect the child and ascertain the best interests of the child, the social welfare authorities shall ensure that the care plan corresponds to this aim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-160653

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2016

16 janvier 2016

These included swaddling ( pucken ) a child from birth until the age of around three, involving wrapping the child up very tightly to suppress any urge to move.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-101024

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2010

15 septembre 2010

When ordering such access, the competent court may, under the 2003 law, decide that visits to the child by the bereft parent should be supervised by a person accompanying the child, in order to prevent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0406DEC007206417

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2023

6 avril 2023

of the child which had been adopted in the course of proceedings between the parents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD005462819

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2022

11 janvier 2022

    The case concerns an allegation of international child abduction and the domestic courts’ decisions, under Article 8 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110068

Admin. suprême

3 février 2012

3 février 2012

The applicant was permitted to see her daughter in the presence of the child care authorities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504JUD002738020

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2023

4 mai 2023

Subsequently, the applicant met with the child on 13 September 2019 and was also informed when the child moved to another place of residence. 4 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1007JUD005241118

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2021

7 octobre 2021

The child continued to live with S, who is the mother of the child. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216783

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2022

11 mars 2022

I.T. never sought to establish his paternity in respect of the child. In 2020 I.T. abducted the child. The first applicant sought to have criminal proceedings instituted against him, in vain.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193708

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2019

15 mai 2019

After the husband had been granted subsidiary protection in the Netherlands in 2010, his wife and oldest child were given permission to join him in October 2013 for purposes of refugee ‑ family

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242670

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2025

12 mars 2025

F1 continued to have contact with the child, whom he treated as his own.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202143

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2020

4 mars 2020

According to the applicant, in the relevant proceedings the courts failed to give due consideration to the best interest of the child, had not duly examined the existence of the exceptions provided by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909DEC005627117

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2021

9 septembre 2021

    Under section 4-12 of the 1992 Child Welfare Act ( barnevernloven ) a child may be taken into public care if there are serious deficiencies in the daily care of the child or in relation to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC000531312

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2019

22 octobre 2019

It was noted that relations between the child and the father had improved. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0409DEC001828091

Admin. suprême

9 avril 1992

9 avril 1992

of that child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD005767818

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2021

1 juillet 2021

The child welfare services were authorised to supervise the contact sessions. 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-147104

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2014

15 septembre 2014

If a child was born during a marriage, or within three hundred days from its termination or annulment, it will be presumed that he/she is the child of the mother’s husband.

Source officielle