In particular, it introduced a blanket prohibition to any development in forests (see below). In 1976 the municipality of Cholargos rejected the association's application for an altitude study.

with Article 14     The Court noted that it had already indicated, in the context of the complaints under Article 8, why it considered that the investigation and discharge together with the blanket

    As concerns the applicant’s numerous motions and complaints, including motions to challenge the judges, the Court recalls that the applicant cannot be blamed for using the avenues available

    As concerns the applicant's motions and appeals, the Court recalls that the applicant cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests

    The Government blamed this on the applicants’ inaction, noting that they should have instituted eviction proceedings which in the light of Article   16A of Chapter 69 of the Laws of

Mrs   Marinova blamed the death on her daughter’s former partner. No violation of Article 2   Sabeva v.

As a defendant he cannot be blamed for having called his witnesses after the prosecution witnesses had been examined.

The Government further maintained that the Bailiffs Service had performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay. 16.

The Government contended that the Bailiffs’ Service performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.

The latter, in the Government’s opinion, performed all necessary actions and could not be blamed for the delay.

However, the applicants cannot be blamed for their intention to appear in person at the hearings or to strengthen their arguments by procuring evidence (see, mutatis mutandis, Sokolov v.

The Court reiterates in this respect that the applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in the defence of his interest (see, for instance, Kutsenko

The Government contended that the Bailiffs’ Service performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.

There had been no blanket ban preventing the applicant from sharing and receiving information and the interception of one letter did not meet the threshold of significant disadvantage. 11.

The Court considers that the applicant cannot be blamed for having made use of his right to institute constitutional proceedings complaining about the fairness of his criminal proceedings before they came

The courts also seem to have failed to consider and distinguish, as necessary, between blanket refusals and the possibility of providing the information in a different format from that requested by the

DÉCISION DÉFÉRÉE : Jugement du CONSEIL DE PRUD'HOMMES - FORMATION PARITAIRE DE ROUEN du 04 Avril 2024 APPELANTE : Madame [R] [F] [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] représentée par Me Emilie BLAVIN

Considering the short period of time between the decisions of the Constitutional Court and the IAP, the applicant may not be blamed for the failure to request a further hearing in the second set of the

However, in respect of her procedural requests and appeals, the Court notes that she merely exercised her procedural rights and cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to her under the domestic