If so, did the applicant have access to a civil remedy in respect of his claim for compensation on account of the alleged life-threatening attack, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

drafted upon the court’s request, the applicant was suffering from the following conditions: painful coronary heart ischemia, multivascular coronary disease, chronic and acute inferior and anterior heart attack

Their main purpose was to criticise the parliamentary majority and the Government, rather than to personally attack one of the MPs or any other individual.

Articles 3, 9 and 11 of the Convention taken separately and in conjunction with Article 14 established on account of the lack of protection by state authorities from homophobic or religiously motivated attacks

an area under Government control: no violation Facts – In 2013 a court in the Luhansk Region of Ukraine convicted the applicant and four co-defendants of various offences following a series of armed attacks

Furthermore, the Court was not convinced that the impugned statements could be considered as an attack reaching the requisite threshold of seriousness and capable of causing prejudice to M.F.’s personal

As for the alleged impact on judge G.E.’s professional reputation, the Court was not convinced that the impugned press release or the interview could have been considered as an attack reaching the requisite

The documentary did not contain any gratuitous personal attacks against the applicant and did not amount to hate speech, given that it did not incite hatred or violence against a religious group and did

Thus, the circumstances in which the impugned remarks had been made considerably limited their impact, so that they could not be considered as representing in themselves an attack of any gravity on Atatürk

Moreover, the Court considered that the expressions under examination had not amounted to an improper or abusive attack on an object of religious veneration, likely to incite religious intolerance or violating

The applicant had not acted in bad faith and his statements were not a gratuitous personal attack on the Head but part of a debate on matters of public interest.

Iraqi Workers’ Communist Party, fled from Iraq when, in the course of his duties as a hospital doctor, he treated and facilitated the escape of three fellow party members who had been injured in an attack

The Assize Court concluded that the applicant’s son had been a member of a terrorist organisation and come to Adana to carry out terrorist attacks.

during the search of their house in February 2013, while the first applicant had been tortured by State agents to extort evidence incriminating Mr   Khashagulgov in the preparation of a terrorist attacks

The soldier fired a number of shots and the applicant, fearing a terrorist attack, drove on.

(c)     The impugned remarks could not be construed as gratuitous personal attacks or be taken to have had the sole intention of insulting the experts, the public prosecutor or the court.

In 2004 the applicant was found guilty of causing grievous bodily harm to a military officer in the course of a group attack and he was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment.

COMPLAINTS The applicant contends that on 21 January 2011 he was attacked because of his Roma origin, and that the authorities have failed in their obligation to conduct an effective investigation into the attack

Law – Article 3 (procedural aspect): Effective deterrence against serious acts such as intentional attacks on the physical integrity of a person required an efficient criminal-law response.