CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

Tous
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208390

Admin. suprême

4 février 2021

4 février 2021

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life and/or her home, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention? 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221703

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2022

15 novembre 2022

professor of Parasitology and a licensed top-level safety and observer officer for the TFF at the relevant time, was sanctioned with the cancellation of his TFF license on the grounds that he acted contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222865

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2023

6 janvier 2023

    Did the applicants suffer discrimination in the enjoyment of their rights guaranteed by the domestic law on local elections, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol   No. 12 to the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182281

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2018

23 mars 2018

complains, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, that the domestic courts’ decisions ordering him to give the agency possession over the real-estate were arbitrary, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126959

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2013

12 septembre 2013

  COMPLAINTS   In the event of his expulsion to Iran the applicant fears to be detained and subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention owing to his former political activities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0315DEC001190102

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2005

15 mars 2005

He invokes Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention; - the dismissal of his administrative complaint infringed his right of access to a court, contrary to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; - the rejection of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0512DEC001498289

Admin. suprême

12 mai 1989

12 mai 1989

  He claims that he will be arrested upon his entry into Turkey as he no longer has a passport, and will then suffer ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention since he is a Kurd and as

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145291

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2014

3 juin 2014

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-191385

Admin. suprême

6 février 2019

6 février 2019

    Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193449

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2019

3 mai 2019

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, read alone or in conjunction with Article 14 (see mutatis mutandis

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-165760

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2016

22 juillet 2016

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s negative freedom of association (see Chassagnou and Others, cited above, § 103), contrary to Article 11 of the Convention, on account of his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218699

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2022

29 juin 2022

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article   10 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179977

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

  QUESTIONs tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224032

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2023

6 mars 2023

    Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210449

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2021

17 mai 2021

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Alexandru Enache v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181543

Admin. suprême

12 février 2018

12 février 2018

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118351

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2013

12 mars 2013

on the fact that he disclosed to the press information to which he had gained access as a researcher before becoming a public servant, amount to a violation of his right to freedom of expression, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202150

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2020

4 mars 2020

They also alleged that the detention of some of them had been contrary to Article 5 of the Convention and that the conditions of their detention had amounted inhuman and degrading treatment in the sense

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214194

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2021

17 novembre 2021

    The domestic courts held that the applicant’s assembly was contrary to the law, namely Section 25 of the August Ordinance that prohibited assemblies of over 150 participants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-250318

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2026

28 avril 2026

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention, on account of her being designated as a “foreign agent

Source officielle

Page 5 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →