26680/95, §§   39 ‑ 43, 18 July 2000; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no.   29183/95, §   45, ECHR 1999-I; Lingens v.

On 10 July 2008 Tula Regional Court upheld part of the judgment on appeal and remitted the rest for fresh consideration.

xa0; Consequently, it falls to the Court to examine whether the interference was necessary in a democratic society, and specifically whether it was proportionate to the aim pursued (see, for example, Fressoz

Allemagne [GC], n o   22978/05, §§ 144 et 146, CEDH 2010   ; Fressoz et Roire c.

Spain , 23 April 1992, §§ 29-32, Series   A no. 236; and Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §   38-39, ECHR 1999 ‑ I). 32.

authorities but rather to review under Article   10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

Turkey , 16 September 1996, § 65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ IV; and Fressoz and Roire   v. France [GC], no.   29183/95, §   37, ECHR 1999 ‑ I). 14.

Jean Fresel, désigné par ordonnance de référé du président du tribunal de grande instance d'Evreux rendue le 25 mars 1998 et des pièces versées aux débats, que le tracteur litigieux est un millésime 1990

semaine de 9h à 16h, soit du 4 avril 2016 au 2 décembre 2018 et, enfin, en moyenne vingt-deux heures par jour depuis qu'il est pris en charge au sein de l'institut médico-éducatif Les Heures Claires de Freneuse

  27930/05, 6   July   2010; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no.   29183/95, §   37, ECHR 1999 ‑ I).

complained of in the light of the case as a whole and determine whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it are “relevant and sufficient” (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

authorities but rather to review under Article   10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 65, ECHR 1999 ‑ III; Fressoz and Roire v.   France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999 ‑ I; Kasabova v.

exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

  the United Kingdom , 27   March 1996, §   39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ II ; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no.

Turkey judgment (cited above, pp. 2547-48, § 51) and in its Fressoz and Roire v. France judgment of 21   January 1999 ( Reports 1999-, p. …, § 45).

In Fressoz and Roire v.

substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law”, the complaints he intends to make subsequently in Strasbourg (see, among other authorities, the Fressoz

should have been raised, “at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law”, before the national authorities (see, among other authorities, Fressoz

  the United Kingdom , judgment of 27   March 1996, Reports 1996 ‑ II, §   39; Fressoz and Roire v.   France [GC], no.