Belgique - 22831/08 Arrêt 2.10.2012 [Section II] Article 5 Article 5-1-e Aliéné Détention pendant sept ans d’une personne atteinte de troubles mentaux au sein des annexes psychiatriques de deux prisons

    There has accordingly been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. III.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 28.

  5   §   1   (c) of the Convention, and whether his continued detention and the proceedings authorising his detention complied with the requirements of Article 5 §§   3 and 4

  They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 1 “1.     Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

The applicant also cited Article 5 § 5 of the Convention in this connection. 52.     The relevant parts of Article 5 read as follows: “1.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   5 OF THE CONVENTION 32 .

Il invoque les articles 5 §§ 1 et 4 ainsi que 13 de la Convention, dispositions dont les parties pertinentes sont ainsi libellées   : Article 5 «   1.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 26.

They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 1 “1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

    SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L’ARTICLE 5 § 5 DE LA CONVENTION 50.

    Les travaux préparatoires sur l’article 5 § 1 de la Convention 36.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION 9.

    ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION 62.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 29.

Consequently, there has been a breach of Article 5 § 1 in this respect. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 19.

Invoquant une violation de l’article 5 § 1 de la Convention, il allégua que sa détention était illégale en ce que, soit la mesure privative de liberté aurait dû être prise sur la base de l’article 74/5

There has accordingly been a violation of Article   5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of both applicants. ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION Admissibility 19 .

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION The right to adversarial proceedings 9.

The applicant relied on Article 5 §§   1 and 4 and Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention. 2.