CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12322
31 janvier 2019
(a) The positive obligation to put in place a regulatory framework – the lack of security fences and walls around the HSC was in line with the Mental Health Act and the international
Page 49 sur 1364
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111924
11 juin 2012
They started driving away and the two officers, I.H.Y. and H.B., gave chase until Murat Kasap and R.S. crashed into a wall.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146647
3 septembre 2014
The second applicant ... went to the port of Bar in Montenegro, where the truck was loaded with 882 cans of white wall paint in which the cocaine was planted ...
ECLI:CEDH:002-12001
1 février 2018
time the applicant had not given her consent to being admitted to an institution had not in itself exempted the State from having to take appropriate and sufficient measures to protect a minor in such a way
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0310DEC003563116
10 mars 2022
by way of contrast, Nicolae Augustin Rădulescu v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-224999
3 mai 2023
On 21 June 2018 the applicant was given additional cleaning duties for seven days by way of disciplinary punishment in relation to the stickers, on the basis that it had been him who had stuck them.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0301JUD003836804
1 mars 2007
to obtain the case-file from the Batayskiy City Court and to stay the enforcement proceedings until its examination by way of supervisory review. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD001352718
20 mai 2021
Inside the sanitary facility there was a wall hook placed at the height of 1,90 m from the ground. To the right of the wall hook there was a tightly fixed nail which was also used as a wall hook.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0629DEC002852095
29 juin 1999
The applicant alleges that he was ill-treated and tortured in the police car on the way to Istanbul Police Headquarters and during his detention there.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10082
16 septembre 2014
Nor was there any evidence that the United Kingdom authorities were responsible in any way, directly or indirectly, for his death, which had occurred some four months after his release from Camp Bucca,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421DEC005085708
21 avril 2015
The Court also recalls that an acquittal does not in itself deny the person concerned the status of a victim in respect of excessive delays ( Wall v. Poland (dec.), no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1118DEC002039725
18 novembre 2025
Furthermore, it had not only affected the dignity and reputation of Holocaust victims, survivors and their families in a way that was intolerable for society but had also been capable of jeopardising their
ECLI:CEDH:001-157312
24 août 2015
As a result of humidity, the painting on the walls deteriorated and was peeling. The cell was poorly lit and scarcely heated in winter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0312JUD005138007
12 mars 2009
It therefore quashed the judgment of 9 February 2007 by way of supervisory review and remitted the case for a fresh examination. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD001724912
15 décembre 2015
He further indicated that some of the cells at the prison had toilet facilities that were properly separated from the rest of the cell by normal walls and a door. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109DEC002260418
9 novembre 2023
Around the same date, the artist reported the theft of the exhibited hosts and the disappearance of one of the 10 metres of canvas decorating the external wall of the building. 6 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0222DEC002687205
22 février 2011
In the corridor, on the way to his cell, E lost consciousness and fell to the ground. 7.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2371
22 novembre 2007
The applicants’ newspapers published photographs of one of the defendants as she was making her way to an unmarked police vehicle parked in the vicinity of the court to begin a 21 year prison sentence
ECLI:CEDH:002-10532
21 septembre 1994
Limitation on applicants' ability to take legal proceedings, whether by way of a defamation action or by way of judicial review, to challenge findings and conclusions in the Inspectors' report which were
ECLI:CEDH:002-4180
26 octobre 2004
As the applicant refused, a salt solution and syrup were forcibly administered by way of a tube introduced into his nose and another substance was injected.