the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of the United Kingdom would pay the applicant, before 30 May 2003, the sum of 52 500 pounds sterling;   Recalling that Rule

43, paragraph 3, of the Rules of the Court (old Rule 44, paragraph 2) provides that the striking-out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee

43, paragraph 3, of the Rules of the Court (old Rule 44, paragraph 2) provides that the striking-out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee

, the sum of 7 000 euros in respect of non-pecuniary and pecuniary damage as well as in respect of costs and expenses, within three months as from the delivery of the judgment;   Recalling that Rule

the Netherlands would pay the applicant, the sum of 1 000 Netherlands guilders, on an ex gratia basis and 4   851.73 Netherlands guilders in respect of costs and expenses;   Recalling that Rule

sum at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank plus three percentage points from the expiry of the above-mentioned thirty days until settlement;   Recalling that Rule

sum at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank plus three percentage points from the expiry of the above-mentioned thirty days until settlement;   Recalling that Rule

39 of the Rules of Court) until 20 January 2010.

sum at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank plus three percentage points from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement;   Recalling that Rule

The District Court found that the applicant had been aware about the internal discipline rules regarding communication with the press, but still gave the interview.

Austria would pay the applicant the sum of 7 000 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damages and for costs and expenses, within three months as from the delivery of the judgment;   Recalling that Rule

On 23 May 2017, the Court applied an interim measure in the case in accordance with Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, indicating to the respondent Government that “they should immediately secure that the

  46299/99;     Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 49 of the Rules of Court;     Having deliberated;     Decides as follows:   THE FACTS    

Spain - 26737/95 Judgment 19.12.1997 Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Fair hearing Civil appeal to Supreme Court declared inadmissible because new rules of procedure: no violation

   In view of the undertaking referred to under 1., the applicant and the Swiss Government ask the Court to strike the case out of the list in accordance with Rule 49, paragraph 2, of the Rules

that the Government of Greece would pay the applicant, the sum of 1 000 000 drachmas in respect of costs and expenses, within three months as from the delivery of the judgment;   Recalling that Rule

et Rutar Marketing d.o.o. contre Slovénie   (adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 14 mars 2024, lors de la 1492 e réunion des Délégués des Ministres)     Requête n o Affaire Arrêt du

sum at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank plus three percentage points from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement;   Recalling that Rule

On 7 February 2024, the Court applied an interim measure under Rule   39 of the Rules of Court, indicating to the respondent Government “to   immediately transfer the applicant to a hosting facility