CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD000605107
5 avril 2011
Merits a. Argument before the Court 55. The Government argued that the application was manifestly ill-founded.
Page 49 sur 145
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1108JUD004348109
8 novembre 2012
Merits 1. The applicant association’s submissions 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120JUD004133806
20 novembre 2012
She also argued that the lower courts had wrongly established that M.B. had caused the car accident merely by not being careful.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0528JUD000017315
28 mai 2019
That reasoning could not be merely declaratory.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD000799414
8 novembre 2016
The Russian courts had examined the merits of the challenge to the exclusion order and had upheld it as lawful. 38.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD002238503
19 avril 2011
It transpired that she never gave anybody her home address.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD006829401
6 novembre 2008
On 9 July 2000 the police tried to apprise the applicant of this refusal but could not find him at his address. 2.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0325JUD003110796
25 mars 1999
The Court heard addresses by Mr Tagaras and Mr Georgakopoulos, and also their replies to a question from one of its members. THE FACTS I. the circumstances of the case A.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0723JUD000609509
23 juillet 2019
merely been an offence punishable by a fine of up to RUB 1,000 at the time (equivalent to 30 euros).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0828JUD001117084
28 août 1991
In addition, the expert had exceeded his duties by expressing a view on questions of fact and of law instead of merely carrying out a chemical analysis.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1030JUD000575309
30 octobre 2014
Merits 1. The parties’ submissions (a) The Government 41.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0628JUD000781977
28 juin 1984
The Court heard addresses by Mr. Baker for the Government and by Mr. Opsahl and Mr. Thornberry for the Commission and also replies to questions put by it and by two of its members. 7.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC005851000
9 juillet 2002
His chances of being apprehended were also increased, given that he had no identity card, no fixed address and no accommodation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1021DEC002979896
21 octobre 2003
Judicial review is concerned with reviewing not the merits of the decision in respect of which the application for judicial review is made, but the decision making process itself ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1221JUD005316610
21 décembre 2021
Merits The parties’ arguments 75 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1002JUD001531909
2 octobre 2014
Merits 1. The applicant’s submissions 57.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0509DEC001871491
9 mai 1994
And this must involve a review of the merits of the decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD007331601
26 juillet 2005
The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD003301108
24 juin 2014
Merits 1. The parties’ submissions (a) The applicant 66.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0420JUD000609716
20 avril 2021
According to the Government, all this was merely a routine medical examination prior to the applicant’s admission into a detention facility.