Court H.R., Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 20, para. 44).   The claim or dispute must be "genuine and of a serious nature" (see e.g.

Court HR, Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 23, para. 51, and Albert and Le Compte v.

Court H.R., Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 20, para. 45).

Court H.R., Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 20, para. 44).

find that any domestic costs or expenses to which the applicant referred were incurred in order to try to prevent the violation established by the Court or to obtain redress therefore ( Le Compte, Van Leuven

exercise of one of his (civil) rights is unlawful and complains that he has not had the possibility of submitting that claim to a tribunal meeting the requirements of Article 6 § 1” (see Le Compte, Van Leuven

D.H., arrêt Le Compte, Van Leuven et De Meyere du 23 juin 1981, série A n° 43, p. 20 par. 44). Cette revendication ou contestation doit être "réelle et sérieuse" (voir Cour Eur.

  D.H., arrêts Le Compte, Van Leuven et De Meyere du 23 juin 1981, série A n° 43, p. 20, par. 44 in fine, et Sporrong et Lönnroth du 23 septembre 1982, série A n° 52, p. 30, par. 81).

the applicant the sum of EUR 3,000 for the costs incurred domestically, in particular those undertaken with a view to expediting the proceedings complained of (see, mutatis mutandis , Le Compte, Van Leuven

Court H.R., Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A No. 43, p. 20 para. 44).

xa0;        Rudi VAN EIJK 03/12/1962 Dutch Amere                     Sander VAN LEEUWEN

Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 23, para. 51, sub-paragraph <b>; Albert and Le Compte judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, para.

  Court H.R., Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A No. 43, pp. 26-27, paras. 64-65).

Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 39, para. 95; the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 24, para. 55; and the Belilos v.

judicial review should enable the court to take account of all the factors involved, including those concerning the proportionality of the restrictive measure (see, mutatis mutandis , Le Compte, Van Leuven

; Pour ce qui est tout d'abord de l'impartialité personnelle des magistrats, le Gouvernement rappelle qu'elle doit être présumée jusqu'à preuve du contraire (arrêts Piersack précité, Le Compte, Van Leuven

       Le 9 mai 1993, le journal "De Standaard" publia un article d'un professeur de sociologie du droit à la Katholieke Universiteit van Leuven intitulé (Traduction) "Les protections

appellate court cannot review the merits of the case, including a review of the facts and an assessment of the proportionality between the fault and the sanction (see, for instance, the Le Compte, Van Leuven

Convention guarantees the right of access to court to an applicant who has, at least on arguable grounds, claims concerning a civil right or obligation (see, among many other authorities, Le Compte, Van Leuven

As the Court has consistently held, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences are not sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see the following judgments: Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere