He was married to a German national from 2005 to 2009. In 2010 he was granted a residence permit in his own right, irrespective of his previous marriage.

any application in this regard during the trial and, in any event, any such request to a German Court would have had no prospects of success in view of the relevant provisions of the German Code of Criminal

          The second and third applicants, German citizens born in 1940 and 1953, respectively, reside at Düsseldorf.

a] court interpreter, I would once again like to draw your attention to the fact that German law is not applicable in this case.

the German Criminal Code ( Strafgesetzbuch ).

  He was previously the Minister for State Security (Minister für Staatssicherheit) of the former German Democratic Republic.

    The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by   their Agents, Mrs   H.

        The applicant, born in 1939, is a German national and residing in Frankfurt/Main.

German reunification was “in the public interest”.

case originated in an application (No. 33379/96) against Germany, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 9 January 1996 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Edgar Klein, a German

The treaty for German reunification provided that administrative acts of the GDR could be set aside if they were found to be incompatible with the rule of law.

on remand lasting over 2 years 6 months: violation Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of criminal proceedings: no violation Facts : In December 1992 the applicant, a German

lodged on 21 May 2007, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Ernst Sakewitz, is a German

Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 March 2010, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Ms Astrid Krämer, is a German

established: (a) that the children had been born in Croatia but had before their retention had habitual residence in Germany, (b) the applicant and the children’s mother had never married and, (c) under German

The German Ministry of Justice has not yet taken a decision on whether or not to authorise the applicant’s extradition. The applicant was released from detention pending extradition in April 2008.

widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  THE FACTS   The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows:   The applicant is a German

Dougin, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 24 May 2012, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Istvan Repaczki, is a German

Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 14 November 2005, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Markus Laubert, is a German