Recommendation R   (2000)   2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of

Following his interlocutory appeal ( sťažnosť ), the detention order was upheld by the Košice Regional Court on 17 January 2012. 5.

Lithuania - 46454/11 Judgment 31.5.2018 [Section I] Article 3 Inhuman treatment Extradition Inhuman treatment following applicants’ extraordinary rendition to CIA: violations [This summary also covers

In 1991, following the adoption of the Agricultural Land Act (“the ALA”), the applicants applied for the restitution of the land.

The Court notes that following the Constitutional Court’s judgment of 10   September 2019, the applicant did not lodge a fresh constitutional complaint.

Nielsen , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 23 September 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Recommendation R   (2000)   2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of

Following the applicants’ request for increased compensation, on 4   November 1999 the İskenderun Civil Court of First-instance awarded them additional compensation of 5,371,080,000 Turkish Liras

  Immediately following the judgment a memorandum interpreting and explaining the legal consequences of the judgment was produced.

Following the European Court’s judgment the applicant had the possibility to re-apply for legal-aid and for leave to lodge a cassation appeal out of time.

Following these modifications, persons whose accounts had been transferred from offshore banks would benefit from the same reimbursement conditions as the other creditors.

Romania - 33234/12 Judgment 31.5.2018 [Section I] Article 3 Inhuman treatment Extradition Inhuman treatment following applicants’ extraordinary rendition to CIA: violations [This summary also covers the

Berger , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 5 July 2005, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

  Chamber judgments [1] concerning Estonia, Germany, Russia and   “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following

Quesada , Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 10   June 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Italy 19/01/2017 Filippo TONOLO 1965 Milan Italian Pasquale PANTANO Milan Applicant convicted, following a plea-bargain, of fraud (Article 640 bis CC) and bankruptcy fraud (Article 223 of Royal Decree

Berger , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 12   September   2002, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

    Following communication of the application to the Government by the Commission, the case was transferred to the Court on 1 November 1998 by virtue of Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the

On the following day the applicant was taken to a surgeon in the Lyskovo town hospital. The surgeon recorded the applicant’s very high temperature.