Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142360
10 mars 2014
10 mars 2014
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238019
14 octobre 2024
14 octobre 2024
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228815
9 octobre 2023
9 octobre 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see Lav ents v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218163
30 mai 2022
30 mai 2022
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention ( Ivanova and Cherkezov v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179680
1 décembre 2017
1 décembre 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Have there been violations of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression and/or right to peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 10 and/or Article 11 of the Convention (see Vajnai
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212830
30 septembre 2021
30 septembre 2021
The applicant company relies on Article 10, arguing that contrary to the claims in the rectification the article had not alleged an involvement of K. in the concealment of SED party assets.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-236092
4 septembre 2024
4 septembre 2024
2.Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to property contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 because of the lack of compensation for the demolition of his property (see
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187183
28 septembre 2018
28 septembre 2018
Were the domestic courts’ decisions contrary to Article 6 of the Convention (see Barać and Others v. Montenegro , no. 47974/06, 13 December 2011, and Anđelković v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230906
12 janvier 2024
12 janvier 2024
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the taking and retention of his fingerprints and
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225576
30 mai 2023
30 mai 2023
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression and/or freedom of assembly, contrary to Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention ( Brega and
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-117040
5 février 2013
5 février 2013
Was the applicant’s detention applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by Article 5, contrary to Article 18 of the Convention, given, in particular, that in justifying her detention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219078
18 juillet 2022
18 juillet 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201483
29 janvier 2020
29 janvier 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see Times Newspapers
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220233
30 septembre 2022
30 septembre 2022
Two Constitutional Court judges, L.K. and G.S., gave a dissenting opinion on that decision, deeming it contrary to the well-established case-law of the Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC006135000
9 juillet 2002
9 juillet 2002
Nevertheless, not every Tamil belonging to one of the categories at risk ran a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0112DEC001440188
12 janvier 1991
12 janvier 1991
The Government also contend that the military service awaiting the applicants in Iran could not render their return to Iran contrary to Article 3 (Art.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0722JUD003168715
22 juillet 2025
22 juillet 2025
1914/1990 even after its transformation and were not contrary to the Constitution. 9.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0513DEC002958396
13 mai 1996
13 mai 1996
It followed that Section 7 was not contrary to the constitutional guarantee of private property.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226038
27 juin 2023
27 juin 2023
the Spanish government for seeking the enforcement of its judgment no. 259/2015, this time in respect of a decision by the Bureau of 29 October 2019 to accept for processing a motion with content contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC003005296
21 mai 1997
21 mai 1997
The applicant complains that the reimbursement ordered deprived him of his right under Article 5 para. 5 of the Convention to compensation for having been subjected to a treatment contrary
Source officiellePage 49 sur 1005