Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Chambre 09
69f38d41cdc6046d471c4dc3
1 juillet 2025
1 juillet 2025
Rémi BOTTIN Greffier, lors des débats : Mme Corinne MOUILLERON, Commis Assermentée Le Ministère Public ayant eu connaissance de la procédure.
Source officielleChambre 09
69f38d73cdc6046d471c50f1
1 juillet 2025
1 juillet 2025
Rémi BOTTIN Greffier, lors des débats : Mme Corinne MOUILLERON, Commis Assermentée Le Ministère Public ayant eu connaissance de la procédure.
Source officielleChambre 09
69f38e12cdc6046d471c5f2b
1 juillet 2025
1 juillet 2025
Rémi BOTTIN Greffier, lors des débats : Mme Corinne MOUILLERON, Commis Assermentée Le Ministère Public ayant eu connaissance de la procédure.
Source officielleChambre 09
69f39fe5cdc6046d47210ddd
1 juillet 2025
1 juillet 2025
Rémi BOTTIN Greffier, lors des débats : Mme Corinne MOUILLERON, Commis Assermentée Le Ministère Public ayant eu connaissance de la procédure.
Source officielleChambre 09
69f39ff7cdc6046d47210f3f
1 juillet 2025
1 juillet 2025
Rémi BOTTIN Greffier, lors des débats : Mme Corinne MOUILLERON, Commis Assermentée Le Ministère Public ayant eu connaissance de la procédure.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Nantes
ORTA_1907780_20220819
19 août 2022
19 août 2022
G B en vue de l'édification d'une maison d'habitation à titre de résidence secondaire sur un terrain sis 40 rue Bottin au lieu-dit I ; 2°) de mettre à la charge de la commune de Mauges-sur-Loire la somme
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0506DEC003174502
6 mai 2008
6 mai 2008
Article 1355 of the Civil Code was amended by giving both spouses the possibility to keep their surnames.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225686
1 juin 2023
1 juin 2023
Dmitriev (both applicants) (ii) Moscow, 25/11/2021, Support of Memorial (applicant Mr Belenkin) (i) article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, administrative fine of RUB
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-96977
3 décembre 2009
3 décembre 2009
Both applicants subsequently became the objects of civil proceedings, founded on the criminal verdicts against them, in which they were ordered to pay damages.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1594310-1673554
23 février 2006
23 février 2006
In January 1997 the applicant was indicted on both offences. One of the cases was later transmitted to Słupsk Regional Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002567694
28 février 1996
28 février 1996
While confirming that both parties were capable of taking care of the children, the Court found it to be in the best interest of the children to remain together with their mother.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3192579-3553578
6 juillet 2010
6 juillet 2010
Finland (application no. 36498/05) TIME-LIMIT FOR JUDICIAL RECOGNITION OF PATERNITY SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AUTOMATICALLY Unanimously in both cases Violation of Article 8 (right
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11346
24 janvier 2017
24 janvier 2017
In their applications to the European Court, the applicants, who were both adult males serving life sentences for criminal offences, complained under Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158989
6 novembre 2015
6 novembre 2015
The court observed that the Company had indeed incurred expense in securing the attendance of a number of prosecution witnesses during both the preliminary investigation and the trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180966
23 janvier 2018
23 janvier 2018
It further appears that both K.M. and Z.M. complied with the bailiffs’ order to vacate the premises, whereas Z.G., assisted by the applicant, refused to do so, arguing that her name was not indicated in
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155572
26 mai 2015
26 mai 2015
On 19 February 2014 the Oktyabrskiy District Court ordered a psychological examination of the children to assess their relationship with both parents.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD007991213
22 octobre 2020
22 octobre 2020
44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, both with further references).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1017JUD002466994
17 octobre 2000
17 octobre 2000
Both applicants are journalists with “Gençliğin Sesi Dergisi” ( The Voice of Youth Magazine ), the first applicant being the editor and owner of this publication. 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14588
9 avril 2026
9 avril 2026
By subsequent decisions between May 2024 and February 2025, the domestic courts, inter alia , dismissed the applicant’s claim for increased contact with his children and applications made by both him and
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-904124-929126
8 janvier 2004
8 janvier 2004
The Court accordingly held unanimously in both cases that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officiellePage 49 sur 1534