CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 445 résultats pour « Blavet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0118JUD001072203

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2007

18 janvier 2007

The Government contended that the Bailiffs' Service had performed all necessary actions and could not be blamed for the delay.

Page 49 sur 123

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0118JUD000507904

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2007

18 janvier 2007

The Government stressed that the Bailiffs' Service had performed all necessary actions and could not be blamed for the delay. 21.     The applicant disagreed. 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0222JUD007683501

Admin. suprême

22 février 2007

22 février 2007

It has been the Court's constant approach that an applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in the defence of his interests (see, mutatis mutandis,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0329JUD002298604

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2007

29 mars 2007

The length of the enforcement proceedings had been caused by the critical financial situation of the debtor companies and the Bailiffs' Service had performed all necessary actions and could not be blamed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412JUD004135498

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2001

12 avril 2001

The applicant cannot be blamed for making use of available remedies.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0429DEC004654999

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2003

29 avril 2003

Consequently, in such an unclear legal situation, he could not be blamed for a mistake of law either.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0106DEC003338296

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2000

6 janvier 2000

These antiques had been brought to Austria by Mrs H. in her car in black plastic bags under the bonnet of her car, the motor being covered with blankets made of asbestos.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004JUD002047302

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2005

4 octobre 2005

The Government further maintained that the Bailiffs' Service performed all necessary actions and could not be blamed for the delay. 16.     The applicant disagreed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1118DEC006144400

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2003

18 novembre 2003

In sum, the applicant considered that he could not be blamed for the procrastination of the proceedings and that the authorities were responsible for their excessive length.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0329JUD001836803

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2007

29 mars 2007

As for the non-enforcement of the judgment of 6 February 2002 the Government maintained that the Bailiffs' Service performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1110JUD006567911

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2016

10 novembre 2016

Even though he only accepted it in 2011, the Court does not consider that he should be blamed for the delay after 2007, as he was in principle not obliged to agree to a different means of compensation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0706JUD005048714

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2017

6 juillet 2017

12/12/2006 pending More than 10 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 26 day(s) 130 inmate(s) 1.6 m² 6 toilet(s) 6 sinks, no hot water, poor food quality, not provided with warm seasonal clothes and shoes and blanket

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0419JUD002443606

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2012

19 avril 2012

The Court considers that primary responsibility for the delay rested with the domestic authorities because the applicant complied with the rules of procedure and could not be blamed for not lodging her

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0319DEC004597108

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2013

19 mars 2013

This could be concluded from a letter of the applicant to the court in which he blamed other persons for the offence and from an expert opinion pursuant to which the applicant had an ambivalent attidude

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-128180

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2013

16 octobre 2013

They maintain that the prohibition of “homosexual propaganda” introduced by the recent legislation constitutes a blanket ban on the mere mention of homosexuality and that it applies irrespective of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-195113

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2019

8 juillet 2019

On 18   March   2016 the Chief of the Rivne Police decided that O.L.’s actions on 23   February   2016 (notably, badmouthing and threatening the applicant and piercing a blanket with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD000466504

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2010

21 octobre 2010

    With regard to the Government’s argument concerning the applicant’s own responsibility for the delays, the Court reiterates that an applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD002840719

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2024

11 juillet 2024

The appellate court noted that Article 57 1 of the CAO provided for blanket confiscation of all instruments of crime. No right of appeal lay against the above decision. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126314

Admin. suprême

12 août 2013

12 août 2013

A blanket application of legal restrictions tends to be over-inclusive and will thus fail the proportionality test because no consideration has been given to the specific circumstances of the case. ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0330DEC003944498

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2000

30 mars 2000

    Before the court, the applicant gave a different account of the events and blamed the other co-accused, C., for the alleged offences.

Source officielle