d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, ayant pour avocat plaidant Me Cecile BIGUENET-MAUREL de la SCP MB JUSTITIA, avocat au barreau de GRASSE, Appelants Madame [H] [G] [R] [O] épouse [J] représentée par Me Richard SIFFERT

[Adresse 3] [Adresse 8] [Localité 9] représenté par la SCP DUBOSCQ - PELLERIN, avoués à la Cour assisté de Me Florence SILVERE, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : C0660 S.A.

COMPARANT, concluant par la SCP GENET - BRAIBANT avoués à la Cour, et ayant pour conseil la SCP MIRAVETE - CAPELLI - MICHELET, avocats au barreau de REIMS INTIME : Monsieur Michel Y... ... 51500 SILLERY

The appellate court’s decision was silent as to the applicant’s submissions that he had not absconded from the investigation between 10 and 14 March 2013. B.

In this connection, the applicant complained that the authorities had disregarded his right to remain silent and not to incriminate himself.

    Although Mehmet Desde used his right to remain silent before the police, he made statements before the public prosecutor in the absence of a lawyer, where he stated that he had stayed in

According to the form explaining the rights of arrested persons, the applicant was reminded of his rights, including his right to have the assistance of a lawyer, to remain silent, and to inform his family

    According to a form dated 19 February 2004 which explained an arrested person's rights, the applicant was reminded of her right to remain silent and was informed that she could request the

applicant’s signature, the applicant did not benefit from the assistance of a lawyer during the reconstruction of events and was not informed of his rights to request legal assistance and to remain silent

There is no indication that the applicant was advised of any rights, in particular of the right to remain silent or the right to a lawyer.

B..., - et les observations de Me Silleres, représentant la commune d’Agde. Considérant ce qui suit : M.

It noted that it had invited the applicant to give a statement before the court in respect of the circumstances of the case and had informed him of his right to remain silent.

  31178/96, 6   December 2001; Siebert   v.   Germany (dec.), no.   59008/00, 9   June 2005).

Siebert, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 3 mars 2026. La rapporteure, G. GrandjeanLe président, B. Coudert La greffière, A.

Siebert, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 3 mars 2026. La rapporteure, G. GrandjeanLe président, B. Coudert La greffière, A.

Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 1er août 2025, la société DLE Ouest, représentée par Me Siebert, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce qu'il soit mis à la charge de la société Surcin Travaux

  Before the Court he is represented by Mr Michele Gentiloni Silverj, a lawyer practising in Rome.   The facts of the present case, as submitted by the parties may be summarised as follows.

de la procédure, dans la mesure où elle a expliqué dans son arrêt que ces présomptions étaient fondées sur des éléments factuels (paragraphe 11 ci ‑ dessus   ; voir, mutatis mutandis , Sievert

  8)   Silveri c. Italie (n°   44353/98) Durée de la procédure   : neuf ans et quatre mois.