The applicant was a sheep farmer who was under investigation by the local trading standards officers for the way in which he kept his sheep.

Iuliana Peicev, of whom the applicants Maria Peicev and Lidia Peicev are the heirs, sold her share of 1/11 of the property to the applicants Mrs. Florica-Maria Petroiu and Mr.

Before that she owned a quarter undivided share as of 1982, and three quarters undivided share as of 2013, resulting from parts which she inherited following her parents’ respective demise.

They further explained that other assets could not be sold, as the State owned 51   % of the debtor company’s share capital.

On 24 August 2006, the applicant's daughter Mrs Valentina Ivanovna Svistun informed the Court that she wished to pursue the application. 5.

As she was leaving, guards searched her and seized a handwritten note with ideas about the case she had prepared overnight and a typed draft of the legal position in Mr Lebedev’s case.

  It follows therefore that this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (art. 27-2) of the Convention.

Kemijoki Oy is a limited liability company in which the State holds the vast majority of the shares.

She is a painter, resident in İstanbul.     The facts of the present case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The Court finds that the final domestic decision within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention was given by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on 20 March 1997, prior to 11 September 1997, which is

There is nothing to indicate that he would not have hunting rights in relation to his property's share of the joint area.

She therefore cannot claim to be a victim of the measure complained of and her application is thus incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 27 para

They submit that the matter resembled the granting of a professional licence and therefore concerned a “civil right” within the meaning of this provision.

She attended the hearing and was given the floor. When she started speaking the judge told the applicant that she should keep herself at a greater distance so that she would not splutter at her.

She also claimed BGN   22,780 (the equivalent of EUR 11,680) for lost rent. 56.

Immediately before they opened, the Court had held a preparatory meeting. There appeared before the Court: - for the Government   Mr. H.

The shares were valued at AMD 531,616,000 and were to be sold at roughly 17% of their price.

    On 1 April 1998 the applicant’s ex-wife (“the plaintiff”) brought a civil action against him seeking a declaration that she owned a half share of a property acquired during their marriage

As she passed the scene of the explosion, mortar shells started exploding on the roadside. She received a wound to the head and died instantly.