CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11598
25 juillet 2017
Law – Article 35 § 3 (a): According to Article 39 § 2 of the Convention friendly-settlement negotiations are confidential and Rule 62 § 2 of the Rules of Court further
Page 48 sur 2215
ECLI:CEDH:002-7310
6 novembre 2012
In April 2011 the Immigration Rules were amended to permit refugees to be joined in the United Kingdom by post-flight spouses during their initial period of leave to remain.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0409DEC005827112
9 avril 2013
On 10 September 2012, the applicants’ request for a Rule 39 indication was granted by the Court as was their request that their identity should not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 3).
cr
61372553cd5801467741cc62
8 octobre 1991
agent de la force publique ; "aux motifs que le 2 mars 1989 en début de matinée, un véhicule du commissariat de police de Caen se trouvait en stationnement à proximité du siège social de l'entreprise Rufa
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1112DEC003142818
12 novembre 2019
On 6 July 2018 the Court granted an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court to prevent the applicant’s removal to Bangladesh prior to its consideration of his application.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0903DEC002715518
3 septembre 2019
39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427JUD005021099
27 avril 2004
The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0110JUD001287909
10 janvier 2019
of the Rules of Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD000538610
24 mars 2022
(“the Internal Disciplinary Rules”). 11.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0616DEC000137105
16 juin 2009
Ms Ruža Jankovič was represented before the Court by Mr Roman Završek, a lawyer practicing in Ljubljana.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412DEC000935903
12 avril 2007
declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Aleksander Wróblewski, is a Polish national who was born in 1937 and lives in Ruda-Huta
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD001077018
16 janvier 2020
Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 January 2020, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160663
11 janvier 2016
It was only where that method proved unsatisfactory in determining how a certain rule should be applied that other methods of interpretation should be applied.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0910DEC003326996
10 septembre 1998
" means rules under section 47 of this Act".
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628DEC001094110
28 juin 2011
THE LAW The Court considers it appropriate to join these applications (Rule 42 of the Rules of Court). Article 37 of the Convention provides: “1.
civ1
613724decd5801467741906e
19 décembre 2006
X... ayant assigné la société Valente, aux droits de laquelle se trouve la société Rullier Agri Technic, en résolution de la vente d'un tracteur, l'arrêt confirmatif attaqué (Bordeaux, 10 janvier 2005)
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-71782
14 décembre 2005
43, paragraph 3, of the Rules of the Court (old Rule 44, paragraph 2) provides that the striking-out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee
ECLI:CEDH:001-71777
settlement it was agreed that the Government of Poland would pay the applicant the global sum of 10 000 Polish Zlotys, within three months as from the delivery of the judgment; Recalling that Rule
ECLI:CEDH:001-72609
22 février 2006
ECLI:CEDH:002-6310
11 octobre 2001
In January 2000 the Fourth Section decided to apply Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and asked the parties for more information, in particular about the persecution suffered by the applicant’s family.