CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
7ème - 2ème SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000029724763
7 novembre 2014
11 septembre 2014 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentés pour le syndicat départemental de traitement des déchets ménagers de l'Aisne (Valor'Aisne), dont le siège est Faubourg de Leuilly
Page 48 sur 252
Cour d'Appel
6253cac2bd3db21cbdd8bfb6
27 juin 2008
Miodrag X... ... 59120 LOOS Présent et assisté de Me Bérengère LECAILLE (avocat au barreau de LILLE) substitué par Me GUERIN INTIME : M.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-247959
10 décembre 2025
not comment on the applicant’s argument that the fact that he had hit his neighbour had never been contested, it was a question of legal classification and interpretation of which he, not initially legally
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC004825915
31 mai 2016
It stated that the Marbles had been legally acquired by Lord Elgin.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4946
3 avril 2003
question were not proved and that the abovementioned evidence could not support the truth of the allegations, since the first item was declared null and void by the Council and the second item was not legally
ECLI:CEDH:002-1218
8 décembre 2009
The applicant could not have been required, without infringing her right to religious freedom, to marry legally, that is to say under canon law, when she expressed her consent to marry according to Roma
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2882047-3171852
8 octobre 2009
one hand the presence of the Public Prosecutor – who had made oral submissions at the hearing before the Supreme Court – and on the other hand the absence of the applicant who, moreover, had not been legally
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-121706
30 avril 2013
particular “that no fair trial could be considered to have been held where the reason given in the relevant domestic decision was not envisaged by the domestic legislation and, therefore, was not a legally
ECLI:CEDH:002-3518
24 janvier 2006
In the present case, the applicant had chosen to become a civil servant; the “tolerance” shown by the authorities, on which the applicant relied, did not make the rule at issue any less legally binding
ECLI:CEDH:002-14100
1 juin 2023
relationship, whereby the reality of their situation would not be entirely disregarded by the existing legal framework and whereby the State would confer a sense of legitimacy on their relationship by legally
ECLI:CEDH:001-229352
6 novembre 2023
V Kop 97/22) held that the applicant’s extradition to the United States of America would be legally permissible. On 5 April 2023 the Warsaw Court of Appeal upheld that decision (case no.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2300691-2473971
25 mars 2008
However, it considered that the prosecutor’s statement could be regarded as an official declaration that the applicant was guilty despite the fact that that had not yet been legally established, in breach
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327JUD004400905
27 mars 2008
As a result, the judge declared the applicant legally incapable, referring to the experts’ findings. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD006124308
13 janvier 2015
This requires member States to have a legally recognised system specifying the conditions under which removal of organs or tissues is authorised.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0411JUD001448607
11 avril 2019
He further observed that his client had not been legally represented while making that confession.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD000195510
10 janvier 2017
The evidence, however, points in the opposite direction, both legally and socially. Legally, cohabitation in Poland does not grant any rights or obligations to the cohabiting partners.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503DEC006539713
3 mai 2016
The boards had the power to set legally-enforceable minimum wages. By 1921 there were over forty trade boards covering three million workers.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1027JUD001853591
27 octobre 1994
The Supreme Court found that section 1:198 (3) CC constituted an "interference" within the meaning of Article 8 (art. 8), since it obstructed the formation of legally recognised family ties unless the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD004507109
22 mars 2012
The decision to reject the applicant’s request to legally establish his paternity of R. thus interfered with his right to respect for his private life. 61.
Chambre sociale 4-4
67ef68b26b85edc07d345400
2 avril 2025
rendu le 17 février 2023 par le Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire de CHARTRES Section : E N° RG : 2022-3642 Copies exécutoires et certifiées conformes délivrées à : Me Bertrand LEBAILLY