margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Publié le 28 juillet 2025   CINQUIÈME SECTION Requête n o 16835/24 BOCCARD

Therefore, the legal remedies mentioned by the Government, namely a criminal prosecution for minor bodily injuries and an action for damages against those responsible, could not, in the circumstances of

As appears from the case file, on 8 February 2011 the Suvorovskiy District Court of Odessa by its final decision found the applicant guilty of causing severe bodily injuries and sentenced him to 4 years

#xa0; Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established on account of the ineffectiveness of a criminal investigation for a bodily

xa0;   Relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant complained about the domestic court’s decision to discontinue the criminal proceedings brought against a third person who had caused bodily

The applicant lodged a criminal complaint against X who was subsequently prosecuted for causing bodily harm to the applicant but also for another incident that had occurred in October 2012, where he had

On 21 April 2006 the Town Court convicted the applicant of inflicting grievous bodily injuries resulting in the victim’s death.

He was convicted of causing bodily injury by negligence and was ordered to pay Ž.K. 10,725 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. The applicant paid that amount.

The case was sent for trial and on 20 October 2016 L.V. was convicted for inflicting bodily harm, sentenced to 140 hours of community service and ordered to pay the applicant 5,000 Moldovan lei (equivalent

After on 29 October 1997 the Sisak State Attorney Office dropped the charges against the applicant, consisting of causing grievous bodily harm to a third person, the victim, a certain M.K., took over the

In that connection, what were the grounds necessitating the retrieval of bodily samples in the context of the criminal proceedings against the applicant (see Jalloh v.

On 15   October 2010, further to her complaint, the applicants’ father was remanded in custody and charged with inflicting grievous bodily harm on his wife.

On 5 February 2015 the Vukovar Police Department (Policijska uprava vukovarsko-srijemska) issued a penal order finding the applicant guilty of causing a road accident in which T.G. sustained a bodily injury

In July 1997,   the prosecution decided to press the lesser charges of theft and occasioning actual bodily harm instead. The applicant pleaded not guilty.

    On 2 August 2006 the Aleksinac Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office indicted the applicant for causing death and bodily harm by dangerous driving ( teško delo protiv bezbednosti javnog saobraćaja

On 21 April 2017 they opened a criminal case into the infliction of minor bodily injuries under Article 125 § 1 of the Criminal Code.

[O] [F] - [Adresse 2] représentée par Me Monique BOCCARA SOUTTER, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : #C0649 DÉFENDERESSE S.C.I.

BOCCALNI & G. MIGAUD "ABM DROIT & CONSEIL") C/ La société L'ORANAISE S.A.R.L.

JBA FINANCES Appel dirigé contre 2 décisions : celle au fond & l'avant dire-droit [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me David BOCCARA, avocat au barreau de Paris, toque : C0957 COMPOSITION