It will however apply to disputes of a “genuine and serious nature” concerning the actual existence of the right as well as to the scope or manner in which it is exercised ( Benthem v. the Netherlands

D.H., arrêt Benthem du 23 octobre 1985, série A n° 97, p. 15, par. 32).     47.

A case study on the conservation and taxonomic/functional/trophic dynamics of soft bottom benthic assemblages in the bay of Saint-Brieuc " et soutenue le 14 décembre 2021 auprès de l'école doctorale des

  163, pp. 20-21, § 73; Benthem v. the Netherlands , judgment of 23   October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 16, § 36). 27.

Brenne et s'inscrit dans l'unité paysagère du Boischaut méridional qui se caractérise par une topographie vallonnée, avec peu de vues lointaines, traversée par les vallées de l'Anglin au nord et de la Benaize

  Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 14, para. 32).

It will however apply to disputes of a “genuine and serious nature” concerning the actual existence of the right as well as to the scope or manner in which it is exercised ( Benthem v. the Netherlands

Article 6 § 1 will however apply to disputes of a “genuine and serious nature” concerning the actual existence of a right as well as to the scope or manner in which it is exercised (see Benthem v. the

   As to whether there was a "contestation" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (art. 6-1), regard should be had to the principles enunciated in the Court’s case-law, summarised in the Benthem

Article 6 § 1 will however apply to disputes of a “genuine and serious nature” concerning the actual existence of a right as well as to the scope or manner in which it is exercised (see Benthem v. the

  Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A No. 97, p. 14, para. 32).

d'obstacle à un correcte interprétation des termes de l'article 6 par. 1 "contestations sur des droits et obligations de caractère civil", à tel point que dans son rapport du 5 octobre 1983 dans l'affaire Benthem

d'obstacle à un correcte interprétation des termes de l'article 6 par. 1 "contestations sur des droits et obligations de caractère civil", à tel point que dans son rapport du 5 octobre 1983 dans l'affaire Benthem

Court HR, Benthem v. the Netherlands judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 14, para. 32).

In addition, the dispute was genuine and of a serious nature (see, among other authorities, the Benthem v. the Netherlands judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 15, para. 32).

Article 6 § 1 will, however, apply to disputes of a “genuine and serious nature” concerning the actual existence of a right, as well as to the scope or manner in which it is exercised (see Benthem v. the

This provision applies to disputes of a “genuine and serious nature” concerning the actual existence of a right as well as to the scope or manner in which it is exercised ( Benthem v. the Netherlands ,

Erick Altabe, Mr Jean-Jacques Assouline, Mr   Stéphane Aszerman, Mr   Alexandre Athea, Mr Michel Athouel, Mr Jean-Jacques Avrane, Mr   Alain Batarec, Mr Richard Benichou, Mr Laurent Bennaim

Court H.R., Benthem v. Netherlands judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 14, para. 32).