CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD005111107
14 janvier 2020
affiliated with the production entities and owning shares in them ought to have been regarded as “interested parties” under the Public Companies Act of 1995 and, as such, should have been excluded from the voting
Page 47 sur 64
LE QUINZE, VOLFINGER, Arnaud
13/10/2008
Voir →
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1029JUD003010018
29 octobre 2019
In its General Comment No. 25 on the right to participate in public affairs, voting rights and the right of equal access to public service, the United Nations Human Rights Committee held
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD004246113
16 septembre 2014
) (f) open the sessions, preside over the sessions impartially, and close them; call Members of Parliament to speak, see to it that the Rules of Parliament are observed, announce the results of the voting
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0611JUD003195311
11 juin 2015
The head of the working group and a member of the relevant electoral commission with a decisive voting right shall prepare a record [ protokol ] on the results of the examination of the signature
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202DEC002016106
2 décembre 2008
According to Article 8, each member of the Federation enjoys voting rights at its meetings in proportion to his paid membership fees.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD003128304
15 mai 2008
The first voting judge, Ms Justice Stabel, gave the following reasons: (23) I have concluded that the reasons given by the High Court do not contravene the presumption of innocence in Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD000698406
10 janvier 2012
The CEC checks whether the ConEC records comply with the law and whether they contain any inconsistencies (Article 108.1) and draws up its own final record reflecting the results of voting in all constituencies
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD003878497
26 février 2002
A general court martial consisted of between five and nine voting members, who were joined by a judge advocate who was called upon to determine questions of law or mixed law and fact during
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD002016106
27 avril 2010
Pursuant to Article 8, each member of the Federation enjoys voting rights at its meetings in proportion to his paid membership fees.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD005367800
16 novembre 2004
The fact that the conviction of the spouse of a politician could affect people’s voting intentions did not in itself render the matter of public interest such as to justify the publication.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1123JUD006684712
23 novembre 2017
On 30 September he was formally notified of the result of the voting in Parliament.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD000464106
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503DEC006539713
3 mai 2016
If the number of worker and employee representatives at any meeting was unequal, members from the side with the highest number were required to refrain from voting to ensure equality.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507JUD003686223
7 mai 2026
Those reforms also restructured the Supreme Council of Judicature (“the SCJ”), expanding its membership to include legal professionals as non ‑ voting participants and granting it authority over
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1019JUD001770702
19 octobre 2004
Thus, States do have a right to limit voting in general to those citizens habitually resident in their territory. This Comment also stated that: “15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC003028796
11 septembre 2001
Austria judgment (no. 28389/95, 21.03.00), it followed that the pivotal question was whether the reasoning employed by the national courts in determining the compensation claim amounted to the voicing
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10930
15 octobre 2015
criminal-law response in Switzerland, that there had been no international law obligation for Switzerland to criminalise such statements, that the Swiss courts appeared to have censured the applicant for voicing
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002571694
27 novembre 1996
The criticism of public authorities cannot in principle be penalised; on the contrary, in a democratic society it should be approved of; however, certain standards must be observed when voicing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0210DEC002857705
10 février 2009
law presumption of falsity had undermined their plea of defence of qualified privilege and was incompatible with their right to freedom of expression as it had had a “chilling effect” that deterred voicing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125JUD000313804
25 janvier 2007
He had merely been ordered to refrain from making clearly defined incorrect statements of fact and by no means impeded from voicing his opinion in other less derogatory and defamatory words.