CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 262 résultats pour « Volfinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD005111107

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

affiliated with the production entities and owning shares in them ought to have been regarded as “interested parties” under the Public Companies Act of 1995 and, as such, should have been excluded from the voting

Page 47 sur 64

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC1 résultat

Journal officiel
Radiations

LE QUINZE, VOLFINGER, Arnaud

SIREN 480271832GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE BOBIGNY

13/10/2008

Voir →

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1029JUD003010018

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 2019

29 octobre 2019

    In its General Comment No. 25 on the right to participate in public affairs, voting rights and the right of equal access to public service, the United Nations Human Rights Committee held

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD004246113

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2014

16 septembre 2014

) (f) open the sessions, preside over the sessions impartially, and close them; call Members of Parliament to speak, see to it that the Rules of Parliament are observed, announce the results of the voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0611JUD003195311

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2015

11 juin 2015

    The head of the working group and a member of the relevant electoral commission with a decisive voting right shall prepare a record [ protokol ] on the results of the examination of the signature

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202DEC002016106

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2008

2 décembre 2008

According to Article 8, each member of the Federation enjoys voting rights at its meetings in proportion to his paid membership fees.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD003128304

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2008

15 mai 2008

The first voting judge, Ms Justice Stabel, gave the following reasons: (23)     I have concluded that the reasons given by the High Court do not contravene the presumption of innocence in Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD000698406

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

The CEC checks whether the ConEC records comply with the law and whether they contain any inconsistencies (Article 108.1) and draws up its own final record reflecting the results of voting in all constituencies

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD003878497

Admin. suprême

26 février 2002

26 février 2002

    A general court martial consisted of between five and nine voting members, who were joined by a judge advocate who was called upon to determine questions of law or mixed law and fact during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD002016106

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2010

27 avril 2010

Pursuant to Article 8, each member of the Federation enjoys voting rights at its meetings in proportion to his paid membership fees.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD005367800

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2004

16 novembre 2004

The fact that the conviction of the spouse of a politician could affect people’s voting intentions did not in itself render the matter of public interest such as to justify the publication.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1123JUD006684712

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2017

23 novembre 2017

On 30 September he was formally notified of the result of the voting in Parliament.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD000464106

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

The CEC checks whether the ConEC records comply with the law and whether they contain any inconsistencies (Article 108.1) and draws up its own final record reflecting the results of voting in all constituencies

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503DEC006539713

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2016

3 mai 2016

If the number of worker and employee representatives at any meeting was unequal, members from the side with the highest number were required to refrain from voting to ensure equality.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507JUD003686223

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2026

7 mai 2026

Those reforms also restructured the Supreme Council of Judicature (“the SCJ”), expanding its membership to include legal professionals as non ‑ voting participants and granting it authority over

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1019JUD001770702

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2004

19 octobre 2004

Thus, States do have a right to limit voting in general to those citizens habitually resident in their territory. This Comment also stated that: “15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC003028796

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2001

11 septembre 2001

Austria judgment (no. 28389/95, 21.03.00), it followed that the pivotal question was whether the reasoning employed by the national courts in determining the compensation claim amounted to the voicing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10930

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2015

15 octobre 2015

criminal-law response in Switzerland, that there had been no international law obligation for Switzerland to criminalise such statements, that the Swiss courts appeared to have censured the applicant for voicing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002571694

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 1996

27 novembre 1996

  The criticism of public authorities cannot in principle be penalised; on the contrary, in a democratic society it should be approved of; however, certain standards must be observed when voicing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0210DEC002857705

Admin. suprême

10 février 2009

10 février 2009

law presumption of falsity had undermined their plea of defence of qualified privilege and was incompatible with their right to freedom of expression as it had had a “chilling effect” that deterred voicing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125JUD000313804

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2007

25 janvier 2007

He had merely been ordered to refrain from making clearly defined incorrect statements of fact and by no means impeded from voicing his opinion in other less derogatory and defamatory words.

Source officielle