On 14 February 2013 the Government requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court concerning an alleged incorrect issue of fact established by the

The President of the Section acceded to the applicant’s request not to have his name disclosed (Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court). 2.     The applicant was represented by Mr R.

On 1 July 2006 the prison authorities informed the applicant that the rules in force did not extend to access to the internet for prisoners.

    On 3 February 2014 the respondent Government informed the Court that the applicant had died on 20 November 2011 and requested revision of the judgment under Rule 80 of the Rules of Court.

Berger , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 3 February 2006, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of

On 19 March 2024, the Court applied an interim measure in the case under Rule   39 of the Rules of Court, indicating to the respondent Government “to place the applicant with no further delay in a

Rules (see paragraphs 6 and 14 above).

He granted priority to the application on the same date (Rule 41 of the Rules of Court). 4.

    APPLICATION OF AN INTERIM MEASURE UNDER RULE 39 OF   THE RULES OF COURT 41.

The applicant was refused permission to apply for judicial review, but his removal was deferred following a Rule 39 indication from the European Court.

The Court joined the cases and noted that according to Rule 47 § 6 of the Rules of Court applicants shall keep the Court informed of all circumstances relevant to their application.

In July 1992 the Minister of Justice made an order applying to the applicant for one year the special rules of detention provided for in section 41 bis of the Prison Administration Act, in consequence

Rule 39 was applied on 24 November 2009 to prevent the applicant’s removal to Kabul on the same day, and the application was communicated to the Government of the United Kingdom on 5 May 2010.

The Committee decided of its own motion to grant the applicant anonymity pursuant to Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court. 2.

On 17   July 2008 the Court indicated to the Government of Turkey, under Rule   39 of the Rules of Court, that the applicant should not be deported to Iran before 29   August 2008.

The Court reiterates that whenever an applicant omits, contrary to Rule   44C § 1 of the Rules of Court, to divulge relevant information of his or her own motion, depending on the particular circumstances

proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 15 December 1989;        Having recommended on 6 February 1990 to the Government of Italy, under Rule

    On 31 July 2018 the applicant’s request for an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court was granted and his removal was stayed for the duration of the proceedings before the Court

5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention, to pay to the applicant the sum of 2 million lire for non-pecuniary damage and the sum