The first applicant was sentenced to a fine of 10,000 Dutch guilders or, in case of non-payment, 100 days' imprisonment, of which 5,000 Dutch guilders or, in case of non-payment

MONTPELLIER INTIMEE : Madame [N] [K] née le 23 Septembre 1972 à [Localité 4] de nationalité Française [Adresse 1] Représentée par Me FAURE substituant Me Sylvain RECHE de la SCP SCP RECHE-GUILLE

X... a obtenu par jugement du 14 mai 2004,la condamnation de son employeur, la société Guil Durance Charles Queyras construction, à lui payer diverses sommes ; que cette société a fait l'objet, le 4 septembre

LABEL PROVENCE NATURE C/ [U] Grosse délivrée le 27 JANVIER 2025 à : - Me GUILLE - Me GAUTIER COUR D'APPEL DE NÎMES CHAMBRE CIVILE 5ème chambre

Although Henrikas Daktaras has not admitted having committed the alleged offences, his guilt has been proved by the witnesses' evidence, ... video and audio records ... and other material collected in

The Court of Criminal Appeal did not, in substance, rule on the guilt or otherwise of the accused.

, increased by permissible annual supplements to 832,14 Dutch guilders.

The same statements had however given rise to conflicting decisions of the lower courts as to the applicant’s guilt.

    In establishing the applicant’s guilt, the first instance court referred to the statements of the five victims, including the pre-trial statements of the head of the prison department and

Damage caused to a private person or legal entity as a result of an unlawful decision, action or omission of a State authority ... shall be indemnified by the State irrespective of the guilt of that authority

The judge noted that the applicant had entirely admitted his own guilt. On 13 July 2009 a formal charge of fraud involving particularly large sums of money was brought against the applicant.

(ii)     As to the “court” called upon to judge the applicant’s case   – As to the allegation of bias on the part of the judges, the applicant’s guilt had been established by evidence that

A judicial decision might reflect that opinion even in the absence of any formal finding of guilt; it sufficed that there was some reasoning suggesting that the court regarded the accused as guilty.

The court referred to the strong probability of the applicant's guilt and to the high risk of his hindering the proper conduct of the proceedings.

5], agissant poursuites et diligences de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège représentée par Me Christofer Claude, avocat au barreau de Paris, vestiaire : R 175, Me Elisa Gueilhers

B..., représenté par Me Guillier, demande au tribunal, dans le dernier état de ses écritures : 1°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 27 mars 2025 par lequel le préfet de police a refusé de lui délivrer un titre

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 6 juin 2023 sous le n° 2305607, Mme A D, demeurant 10 rue du Bois des Glands à Crécy-la-Chapelle (77580), représentée par Me Guillier, demande

A B, représenté par Me Guillier, avocat, demande au Tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté en date du 18 avril 2023 par lequel le préfet de l'Essonne l'a obligé à quitter le territoire français, lui a refusé