CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7260
2 octobre 2012
Thus, the court of appeal’s refusal to award the applicant compensation for the violation of his right not to be discriminated against in the exercise of his rights concerning his family life did not appear
Page 47 sur 1237
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD003341105
Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515JUD001656710
15 mai 2012
Applying the principle of respect for family life, they also found that the rest of the family should be granted a right to stay. 17.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7280
13 novembre 2012
No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD003950208
9 octobre 2012
The applicant’s family attempted to pay the bail.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708JUD005836310
8 juillet 2014
Moreover, he was in conflict with a Syrian family, because he had had an affair with their daughter in 1999 and she had subsequently falsely accused him of rape.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD003997098
22 septembre 2009
The fifth applicant ( Mrs Xanthi Antoniou-Hadjithoma) is the widow of the elder son of the family, X, whom she married in 1983.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10366
10 février 2015
Bulgaria - 77818/12 Judgment 10.2.2015 [Section IV] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Refusal to allow child to travel abroad to join his mother without the consent of the father: violation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD000767809
As to the applicants’ complaint under Article 8, Lord Bingham noted that the police did not interfere with Giles Van Colle’s right to respect for his family life and his personal autonomy
ECLI:CEDH:002-10770
30 juin 2015
Russia [GC] - 41418/04 Judgment 30.6.2015 [GC] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Ban on long-term family visits to life prisoners: violation Facts – The applicant is
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118146
6 mars 2013
605дсп of 6 June 2000 The Regulations do not provide for family visits of persons detained in the special facilities.
3ème chambre magistrat statuant seul
DTA_2203687_20230524
24 mai 2023
A B, représenté par Me Faryssy, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision du 30 septembre 2022 par laquelle la préfète du Gard a suspendu son permis de conduire pour une durée de 6 mois ; 2°
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0528JUD007203817
28 mai 2024
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect
ECLI:CEDH:002-14333
Tribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
DTA_2303484_20230626
26 juin 2023
Sur les fins de non-recevoir opposées par l'association Family Camping : 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD003208811
10 novembre 2022
The names of all family members also appeared on the deeds, under the heading “family members”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607JUD007013914
7 juin 2022
for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life)
ECLI:CEDH:001-110137
6 février 2012
Family Code of 1969.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0903JUD001016113
3 septembre 2015
I recommend that the parents undergo family counselling and possibly afterwards also family therapy together with [their daughter].” 26.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10690
Croatia - 10161/13 Judgment 3.9.2015 [Section I] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Failure to hear child’s views during protracted custody proceedings: violation Article