AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111054
4 avril 2012
4 avril 2012
The applicant also claims that the lawyer who was present during his questioning in police custody refused to put on record his allegations of police brutality.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0830DEC001524417
30 août 2018
30 août 2018
The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”).
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1121
18 février 2010
18 février 2010
Russia - 39660/02 Judgment 18.2.2010 [Section I] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Criminal charge Admissions made by suspect during roadside spot check: Article 6 § 1 applicable Fair hearing
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169509
7 novembre 2016
7 novembre 2016
The lighting was insufficient during the day time and was not turned off during the night. The inmates were allowed to take a shower once a week during 15 minutes. The food was of low quality.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219625
7 septembre 2022
7 septembre 2022
It appears that on 7 and 19 August 2014 the applicant’s father and the applicant, respectively, filed crime reports alleging, inter alia , that during his interview of 26 November 2013 the applicant had
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157475
1 septembre 2015
1 septembre 2015
The applicant stated that during her detention in the Centre the detention centre’s doctor refused to provide her with the treatment required for her pregnancy.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145727
24 juin 2014
24 juin 2014
In application of Article 71 of the Criminal Code, his right to vote and to be elected was withdrawn during detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3755
21 juillet 2005
21 juillet 2005
During the proceedings medical reports were procured which revealed that the applicant had shown no signs of mental suffering before his detention, but that at the time of the examination, that is, at
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186535
3 septembre 2018
3 septembre 2018
If so, was his lawyer present during the search conducted on the applicant’s person and bag? Was the search in accordance with domestic law?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196451
11 septembre 2019
11 septembre 2019
ANDREEVSKI against North Macedonia lodged on 20 June 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant was denied a maternity allowance on the grounds that her employer had received payments from third parties during
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-990
22 avril 2010
22 avril 2010
Court’s case-law No. 129 April 2010 Macready v. the Czech Republic - 4824/06 Judgment 22.4.2010 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Failure to ensure father’s right of contact during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194149
28 mai 2019
28 mai 2019
During the investigation the authorities accused him of having resisted the arrest and attacked the policemen as well as of illegal arms possession.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164838
15 juin 2016
15 juin 2016
During that search one of the police officers had planted drugs on him.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11060
10 mai 2016
10 mai 2016
During the following part of the trip he spent at least two hours being driven in a prison van to and from a detention facility.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178154
27 septembre 2017
27 septembre 2017
He was allegedly interrogated under torture and denied access to legal assistance during this period. He did not provide medical reports in support of his allegations of ill-treatment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142485
21 mars 2014
21 mars 2014
The judge held that Law no. 276 of 2006 on the execution of sentences did not provide for the right to have access to sanitary facilities and water during the prisoners’ daily outside walk. 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9169
21 février 1996
21 février 1996
February 1996 Hussain v. the United Kingdom - 21928/93 Judgment 21.2.1996 Article 5 Article 5-4 Procedural guarantees of review Review of lawfulness of detention Inability of person detained during Her
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175722
27 juin 2017
27 juin 2017
Have the applicants been subjected to degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, on account of their confinement in metal cages in the courtrooms during the proceedings
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155538
28 mai 2015
28 mai 2015
During questioning the applicant was represented by a lawyer.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233929
30 avril 2024
30 avril 2024
While the cassation court eventually excluded from the evidence the applicant’s confessing statements made during that period (he had retracted them as soon as he had started to be legally represented)
Source officiellePage 47 sur 2399