Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188468
20 novembre 2018
20 novembre 2018
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4412
18 mai 2004
18 mai 2004
Even supposing that the applicant's complaint had been substantiated, the applicant's conduct had been contrary to the right of individual petition.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49252
10 novembre 1983
10 novembre 1983
violation of Article 3 (art. 3) of the Convention underlining that the conditions of imprisonment, during the whole period of their detention on remand as well as afterwards, constituted a treatment contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235401
4 juillet 2024
4 juillet 2024
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private life and/or home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242508
28 février 2025
28 février 2025
The applicants complain that their constitutional complaints were declared inadmissible as being lodged outside the four-month time-limit, contrary to the guarantees under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204755
24 août 2020
24 août 2020
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, as a result of the failure of the authorities
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229054
30 octobre 2023
30 octobre 2023
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private and/or family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the manner in which
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197177
2 octobre 2019
2 octobre 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, insofar as the applicant was unable to contest his legal paternity of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175021
7 juin 2017
7 juin 2017
Was the applicant deprived of her liberty merely on the ground of her inability to fulfil a contractual obligation, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179982
11 décembre 2017
11 décembre 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, on account of the criminal proceedings brought
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215691
17 janvier 2022
17 janvier 2022
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention ( Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202689
3 avril 2020
3 avril 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information and/or ideas, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178537
19 octobre 2017
19 octobre 2017
The applicant complains that his extradition to the USA is contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in view of the criminal sanction he is facing there. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230907
8 janvier 2024
8 janvier 2024
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, in particular, Strand Lobben and
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-176191
12 juillet 2017
12 juillet 2017
He therefore argues that his detention was arbitrary and contrary to Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201502
31 janvier 2020
31 janvier 2020
The applicants complain that their expulsion to Serbia took place as a result of a flawed asylum procedure and exposed them to a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention, because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209964
15 avril 2021
15 avril 2021
If so, has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235984
27 août 2024
27 août 2024
The applicant complains, under Article 13 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 thereto, about the lack of regular re-examination of the measure contrary to the domestic law.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229634
22 novembre 2023
22 novembre 2023
Should the answer to the above question be in the affirmative, has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11196
13 décembre 2007
13 décembre 2007
The applicant argued that he had been deprived of his liberty contrary to Article 5 § 1 as the appellate court had ordered his detention to continue even though it considered the original
Source officiellePage 47 sur 1005