Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2953286-3250185
3 décembre 2009
3 décembre 2009
After the child had moved to live with the mother, the parents reached an agreement with the help of the Youth Welfare Office, according to which the applicant would have contact with the child on a regular
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177872
22 septembre 2017
22 septembre 2017
Leaving the child in prison would pose practical difficulties as the family wing did not have enough staff to care for a small child during a mother’s prolonged absence.
Source officiellesoc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2012:SO02384
14 novembre 2012
14 novembre 2012
2011, la Fédération des syndicats Solidaires, unitaires et démocratiques des activités postales et de télécommunications (SUD) a désigné Mme X... en qualité de délégué syndical de l'établissement de Chilly-Mazarin
Source officielle5ème chambre
DTA_2401187_20240503
3 mai 2024
3 mai 2024
La SCI Vol de Nuit demande au tribunal l'annulation de cette décision, en tant qu'elle a affecté un coefficient de localisation de 1,3 aux parcelles cadastrées AB n° 470 à Chilly-Mazarin et W n° 252 à
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0924DEC005560318
24 septembre 2024
24 septembre 2024
rights in respect of the child to whom she had given birth in 2008.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523DEC003966122
23 mai 2023
23 mai 2023
in proceedings relating to an application by the child’s biological father to have the care order in respect of the child lifted. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1203DEC003266996
3 décembre 1997
3 décembre 1997
s natural child.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164591
9 juin 2016
9 juin 2016
The child remained with her mother but maintained frequent contact with her father.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD002010613
28 avril 2016
28 avril 2016
Denial of contact was a measure under the law on child protection.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-166714
22 août 2016
22 août 2016
The child had continued to be exposed to danger, despite the couple’s separation, because the German family court had authorised visits by the child to his father’s house.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-140894
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
She recommended that the child spend several hours with the applicant during a day each weekend.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD000554122
12 septembre 2024
12 septembre 2024
child every other weekend from 3.30 p.m. on Friday to 6 p.m. on Sunday.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0831DEC002389002
31 août 2006
31 août 2006
and the rights of a child born in wedlock as against its parents and their relatives if the parents subsequently marry and the child had been recognised or after the marriage the child is recognised voluntarily
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005444310
1 juillet 2014
1 juillet 2014
The hearing of the child who is ten years old is mandatory. The child who is not ten years old may be heard by the court if it considers that it is necessary.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0322JUD001130816
22 mars 2018
22 mars 2018
separation is necessary to protect the child. ...
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0531DEC003414196
31 mai 2005
31 mai 2005
As the overall aim of child welfare is to protect the child and ascertain the best interests of the child, the social welfare authorities shall ensure that the care plan corresponds to this aim.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0125DEC002726295
25 janvier 2001
25 janvier 2001
Other decisions of a county administrative court relating to child welfare measures cannot be so appealed (section 37 of the Child Welfare Act).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197177
2 octobre 2019
2 octobre 2019
In 2013, three years after his divorce, the applicant found out that he might not be the biological father of the child born in 2006 during his marriage to his former spouse.
Source officielleciv1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:C100830
4 juillet 2018
4 juillet 2018
X... , né le [...] à Concepcion (Chili) du mariage célébré le [...] à Concepcion entre A... Y...
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212585
22 septembre 2021
22 septembre 2021
In the meantime, on 26 February 2018 the applicant lodged a claim with the Court of General Jurisdiction of Yerevan seeking the return of the child. On 14 November 2018 his claim was rejected.
Source officiellePage 47 sur 385